Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

4,136 events, each with its source
VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 1425

Unfinished Business SB1425 Cortese Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1414

Unfinished Business SB1414 Reyes et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1379

Unfinished Business SB1379 Cervantes et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1371

Unfinished Business SB1371 Durazo Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1323

Unfinished Business SB1323 Rubio et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1250

Unfinished Business SB1250 Cortese et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1244

Unfinished Business SB1244 Allen et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1237

Unfinished Business SB1237 Blakespear et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1135

Unfinished Business SB1135 Blakespear et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 96

Assembly 3rd Reading AB96 Jackson By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 264

Assembly 3rd Reading AB264 Carrillo et al. By Archuleta

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 280

Assembly 3rd Reading AB280 Aguiar-Curry et al. By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 306

Assembly 3rd Reading AB306 Schultz et al. By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 312

Assembly 3rd Reading AB312 Alanis By Alvarado-Gil

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 350

Assembly 3rd Reading AB350 Bonta et al. By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 353

Assembly 3rd Reading AB353 Boerner By Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 464

Assembly 3rd Reading AB464 Aguiar-Curry et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 611

Assembly 3rd Reading AB611 Lee By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 685

Assembly 3rd Reading AB685 Solache et al. By Hurtado

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 706

Assembly 3rd Reading AB706 Aguiar-Curry et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 864

Assembly 3rd Reading AB864 Ward By Allen

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 883

Assembly 3rd Reading AB883 Lowenthal et al. By Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 939

Assembly 3rd Reading AB939 Schultz et al. By Caballero

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1049

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1049 Celeste Rodriguez By Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1054

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1054 Gipson et al. By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1128

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1128 Muratsuchi et al. By Allen

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1165

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1165 Gipson et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1184

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1184 Patterson et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1294

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1294 Haney et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1338

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1338 Solache By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1381

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1381 Muratsuchi By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1439

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1439 Garcia et al

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1448

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1448 Hart et al. By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1457

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1457 Bryan By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1547

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1547 Bains By Hurtado Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1577

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1577 Bauer-Kahan By McGuire

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1595

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1595 Schultz By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1599

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1599 Ahrens et al. By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1603

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1603 Schultz By Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1608

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1608 Wilson By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1615

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1615 Nguyen et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1626

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1626 Gabriel et al. By Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1628

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1628 Michelle Rodriguez By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1629

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1629 Haney et al. By Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1641

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1641 Jackson et al. By Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1663

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1663 Wallis et al. By Valladares

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1666

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1666 Rogers By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1679

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1679 Mark González et al. By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1682

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1682 Hart et al. By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1685

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1685 Lackey et al. By Archuleta