Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

4,599 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2369

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2369 Rogers By Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2375

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2375 Blanca Rubio By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2417

Special Consent AB2417 Zbur et al. By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2433

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2433 Alvarez et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2439

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2439 Blanca Rubio et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2518

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2518 Sharp-Collins et al. By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2529

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2529 Johnson By Niello

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2532

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2532 Irwin By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2539

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2539 Ramos By McGuire Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2540

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2540 Stefani et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2562

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2562 Dixon By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2563

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2563 Pacheco et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2598

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2598 Krell et al. By Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2631

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2631 Bauer-Kahan et al. By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2633

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2633 Gipson et al. By Archuleta

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2664

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2664 Bauer-Kahan et al. By Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2664

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2664 Bauer-Kahan et al. By Becker Reconsider

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2664

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2664 Bauer-Kahan et al. By Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2689

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2689 Ávila Farías et al. By Caballero

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2713

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2713 Wicks et al. By Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2779

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2779 Irwin By Allen Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2782

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2782 JUD. (Kalra) By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACA 7

Assembly 3rd Reading ACA7 Jackson et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 96

Special Consent SB96 Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 239

Unfinished Business SB239 Arreguín Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 299

Unfinished Business SB299 Cabaldon et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 490

Unfinished Business SB490 Umberg et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 505

Special Consent SB505 Richardson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 549

Unfinished Business SB549 Allen et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 594

Unfinished Business SB594 Padilla et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 667

Unfinished Business SB667 Archuleta Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 675

That the Assembly amendments be concurred in

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 700

Unfinished Business SB700 Grayson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 747

Unfinished Business SB747 Wiener et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 758

Unfinished Business SB758 Umberg et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 769

Unfinished Business SB769 Caballero et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 772

Unfinished Business SB772 Cabaldon et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 802

Unfinished Business SB802 Ashby et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 837

Special Consent SB837 Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 845

Special Consent SB845 Pérez et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 849

Unfinished Business SB849 Weber Pierson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 894

Unfinished Business SB894 Allen et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 913

Unfinished Business SB913 Becker et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 916

Special Consent SB916 Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 920

Unfinished Business SB920 Archuleta Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 923

Unfinished Business SB923 Becker Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 936

Special Consent SB936 Blakespear et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 955

Special Consent SB955 Blakespear et al. Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 959

Unfinished Business SB959 Grayson et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 965

Special Consent SB965 Blakespear et al