Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

4,599 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1125

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1125 Nguyen By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1167

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1167 Berman et al. By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1195

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1195 Quirk-Silva By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1197

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1197 Calderon By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1224

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1224 Valencia et al. By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1249

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1249 Wilson By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1250

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1250 Papan By Strickland

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1261

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1261 Bonta et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1275

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1275 Elhawary By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1280

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1280 Garcia et al. By Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1308

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1308 Hoover et al. By Jones

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1336

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1336 Addis By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1392

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1392 Sharp-Collins et al. By Grove

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1400

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1400 Soria et al. By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1410

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1410 Garcia By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1411

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1411 Sharp-Collins By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1414

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1414 Ransom et al. By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1501

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1501 Berman By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1455

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1455 Bryan By Becker Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1487

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1487 Addis et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1502

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1502 Berman By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1503

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1503 Berman et al. By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1504

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1504 Berman By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1520

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1520 W., P., & W. (Papan) By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1525

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1525 JUD. (Kalra) By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 5

Unfinished Business SB5 Cabaldon Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 20

Unfinished Business SB20 Menjivar et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 21

Unfinished Business SB21 Durazo et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 40

Unfinished Business SB40 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 50

Unfinished Business SB50 Ashby Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 68

Unfinished Business SB68 Menjivar Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 86

Unfinished Business SB86 McNerney et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 261

Unfinished Business SB261 Wahab et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 262

Unfinished Business SB262 Wahab et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 275

Unfinished Business SB275 Smallwood-Cuevas Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 278

Unfinished Business SB278 Cabaldon et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 279

Unfinished Business SB279 McNerney et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 291

Unfinished Business SB291 Grayson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 301

Unfinished Business SB301 Grayson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 306

Unfinished Business SB306 Becker Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 340

Unfinished Business SB340 Laird et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 355

Unfinished Business SB355 Pérez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 386

Unfinished Business SB386 Limón Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 411

Unfinished Business SB411 Pérez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 419

Unfinished Business SB419 Caballero et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 437

Unfinished Business SB437 Weber Pierson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 454

Unfinished Business SB454 McNerney et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 504

Unfinished Business SB504 Laird et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 514

Unfinished Business SB514 Cabaldon Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 551

Unfinished Business SB551 Cortese et al. Concurrence