Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

4,449 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1256

Unfinished Business SB1256 Jones Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1303

Unfinished Business SB1303 Wahab Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1312

Unfinished Business SB1312 Richardson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1322

Unfinished Business SB1322 Richardson Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 1359

Unfinished Business SB1359 Stern Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1361

Unfinished Business SB1361 Durazo et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1367

Unfinished Business SB1367 Cervantes et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1383

Unfinished Business SB1383 Arreguín et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1394

Unfinished Business SB1394 Gonzalez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1423

Unfinished Business SB1423 Stern Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 775

Assembly 3rd Reading AB775 Fong By Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1129

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1129 Celeste Rodriguez By Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1808

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1808 Carrillo et al. By Valladares Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1890

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1890 Aguiar-Curry et al. By Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2513

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2513 Petrie-Norris By Blakespear

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 2721

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2721 Carrillo et al. By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2793

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2793 G.O. (Blanca Rubio)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 344

Unfinished Business SB344 Weber Pierson et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 900

Unfinished Business SB900 McNerney et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 282

Assembly 3rd Reading AB282 Pellerin By Wahab Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 540

Assembly 3rd Reading AB540 Connolly By Laird

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 605

Assembly 3rd Reading AB605 Muratsuchi By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 917

Assembly 3rd Reading AB917 Ávila Farías By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1039

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1039 Hart et al. By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1542

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1542 Ward By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1602

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1602 Blanca Rubio By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1715

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1715 Schiavo By Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1815

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1815 Wicks et al. By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1883

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1883 Bryan By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1974

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1974 Stefani By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1983

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1983 Blanca Rubio By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2074

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2074 Haney et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2142

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2142 Garcia By Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2179

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2179 Patel et al. By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2253

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2253 Boerner By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2344

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2344 Haney et al. By Arreguín

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2551

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2551 Elhawary By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2573

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2573 Sharp-Collins By Weber Pierson

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 2575

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2575 Ortega By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2575

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2575 Ortega By Padilla Reconsider

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2601

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2601 Lee By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2770

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2770 Alvarez et al. By Jones

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 58

Unfinished Business SB58 Padilla et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 327

Unfinished Business SB327 McNerney et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 329

Special Consent SB329 Blakespear et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 331

Unfinished Business SB331 Menjivar et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 354

Unfinished Business SB354 Limón Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 420

Unfinished Business SB420 Padilla et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 526

Unfinished Business SB526 Pérez Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 626

Special Consent SB626 Smallwood-Cuevas