Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

4,449 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2234

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2234 Papan By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2281

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2281 Berman By Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2294

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2294 Ta et al. By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2319

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2319 Schultz et al. By Allen

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2321

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2321 Ortega et al. By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2329

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2329 Fong et al. By Pérez Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2337

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2337 Lackey By Padilla

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 2434

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2434 Bonta et al. By Caballero

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2437

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2437 Chen By Jones

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2467

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2467 ED. (Patel) By Pérez Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2469

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2469 Papan By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2478

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2478 Schultz et al. By Ochoa Bogh

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2592

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2592 Pacheco et al. By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2597

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2597 Wicks By Cervantes Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2604

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2604 Berman et al. By Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2667

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2667 Hadwick et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2724

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2724 Bauer-Kahan By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2734

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2734 Hart By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2739

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2739 Soria et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2776

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2776 E.S. & T.M. (Connolly) By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2784

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2784 JUD. (Kalra) By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2796

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2796 PUB. S. (Schultz) By Arreguín Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 99

Unfinished Business SB99 Blakespear et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 226

Unfinished Business SB226 Cabaldon et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 259

Unfinished Business SB259 Wahab Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 328

Unfinished Business SB328 Grayson et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 342

Unfinished Business SB342 Umberg et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 457

Unfinished Business SB457 Becker Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 534

Unfinished Business SB534 Padilla Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 561

Unfinished Business SB561 Blakespear et al. Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 577

Unfinished Business SB577 Laird et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 632

Unfinished Business SB632 Arreguín et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 677

Unfinished Business SB677 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 685

Unfinished Business SB685 Cortese Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 691

Unfinished Business SB691 Wahab Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 741

Unfinished Business SB741 Blakespear Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 811

Unfinished Business SB811 Caballero et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 813

Unfinished Business SB813 McNerney et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 828

Unfinished Business SB828 Cabaldon et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 905

Unfinished Business SB905 Becker et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 957

Unfinished Business SB957 Pérez Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 958

Unfinished Business SB958 Weber Pierson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1072

Unfinished Business SB1072 HOUSING (Arreguín) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1078

Unfinished Business SB1078 Laird et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1083

Unfinished Business SB1083 Pérez Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1090

Unfinished Business SB1090 Pérez et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1153

Unfinished Business SB1153 Caballero et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1168

Unfinished Business SB1168 McNerney et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1206

Unfinished Business SB1206 INS. (Padilla) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1213

Unfinished Business SB1213 Reyes Special Consent Concurrence