Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

4,449 events, each with its source
VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 1392

Unfinished Business SB1392 Cortese et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 167

Assembly 3rd Reading AB167 BUDGET (Gabriel) By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 173

Assembly 3rd Reading AB173 BUDGET (Gabriel) By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 175

Assembly 3rd Reading AB175 BUDGET (Gabriel) By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 184

Assembly 3rd Reading AB184 BUDGET (Gabriel) By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 191

Assembly 3rd Reading AB191 BUDGET (Gabriel) By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 193

W/O REF. TO FILE SB193 B. & F.R. (Laird)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 194

W/O REF. TO FILE SB194 B. & F.R. (Laird)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1079

W/O REF. TO FILE SB1079 Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1098

W/O REF. TO FILE SB1098 Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 635

Assembly 3rd Reading AB635 Ahrens et al. By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 28

Assembly 3rd Reading AB28 Schiavo et al. By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 69

Assembly 3rd Reading AB69 Calderon et al. By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 220

Assembly 3rd Reading AB220 Jackson et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 788

Assembly 3rd Reading AB788 Quirk-Silva et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 929

Assembly 3rd Reading AB929 Connolly By Richardson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1099

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1099 Bryan By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1159

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1159 Addis By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1198

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1198 Haney By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1383

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1383 McKinnor et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1405

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1405 Bauer-Kahan et al. By Wiener

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1537

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1537 Bryan et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1540

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1540 Mark González et al. By Menjivar Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1555

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1555 Hadwick et al. By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1578

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1578 Jackson et al. By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1588

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1588 Stefani et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1609

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1609 Zbur By Umberg

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1627

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1627 Ávila Farías et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1687

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1687 Lackey et al. By Archuleta

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1699

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1699 Rogers et al. By Grayson Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1776

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1776 Aguiar-Curry et al. By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1813

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1813 Ward et al. By Caballero

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1843

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1843 Elhawary By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1881

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1881 Ramos et al. By Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1887

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1887 Zbur et al. By Blakespear

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1896

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1896 Mark González et al. By Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1934

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1934 Bennett et al. By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1960

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1960 Bennett et al. By Allen

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1976

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1976 Wicks By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1981

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1981 Aguiar-Curry et al. By Reyes Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2017

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2017 Haney et al. By Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2020

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2020 Gabriel By Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2032

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2032 Ransom By Ashby Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2061

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2061 Chen et al. By Niello

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2103

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2103 Irwin By Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2121

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2121 Berman By Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2152

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2152 Mark González et al. By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2221

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2221 Irwin By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2222

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2222 Ward et al. By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2225

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2225 Patel et al. By Pérez