Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

4,136 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2392

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2392 Fong By Ochoa Bogh

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2409

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2409 Valencia By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2411

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2411 McKinnor By Richardson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2414

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2414 Nguyen By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2414

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2414 Nguyen By Reyes Motion to Reconsider Reconsider

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 2428

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2428 Celeste Rodriguez By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2429

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2429 Blanca Rubio By Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2448

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2448 Berman et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2460

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2460 Celeste Rodriguez By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2468

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2468 Patel By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2471

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2471 E.M. (Ransom) By Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2476

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2476 Ellis By Grove

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2484

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2484 Alvarez et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2493

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2493 Petrie-Norris By Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2493

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2493 Petrie-Norris By Stern Motion to Reconsider Reconsider

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2494

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2494 Rogers et al. By McGuire

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2496

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2496 Solache By Archuleta

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2505

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2505 Carrillo By Archuleta

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2507

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2507 Nguyen et al. By Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2524

AB2524 Gipson By Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2555

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2555 Patel et al. By Pérez Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2561

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2561 Valencia By Jones

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2605

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2605 Arambula et al. By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2613

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2613 Sharp-Collins et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2619

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2619 Papan By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2635

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2635 Celeste Rodriguez By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2684

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2684 Nguyen By Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2764

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2764 Ahrens et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2764

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2764 Ahrens et al. By Menjivar Motion to Reconsider Reconsider

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2764

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2764 Ahrens et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2765

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2765 Ahrens et al. By McNerney Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2783

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2783 JUD. (Kalra) By Reyes Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2788

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2788 TRANS. (Wilson)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2795

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2795 B. & F. (Valencia) By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 608

Unfinished Business SB608 Menjivar et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 633

Unfinished Business SB633 Blakespear Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 865

Unfinished Business SB865 Ashby Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 868

Unfinished Business SB868 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 908

Unfinished Business SB908 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 909

Unfinished Business SB909 Smallwood-Cuevas Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 925

Unfinished Business SB925 McNerney et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 937

Unfinished Business SB937 Gonzalez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 942

Unfinished Business SB942 Caballero et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 988

Unfinished Business SB988 Grayson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 998

Unfinished Business SB998 Gonzalez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1014

Unfinished Business SB1014 Grayson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1077

Unfinished Business SB1077 Gonzalez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1114

Unfinished Business SB1114 Cabaldon et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1116

Unfinished Business SB1116 Caballero Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1125

Unfinished Business SB1125 Menjivar et al. Concurrence