Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

4,449 events, each with its source
VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2717

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2717 Caloza By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2727

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2727 Nguyen et al. By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2760

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2760 Sharp-Collins et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 16

W/O REF. TO FILE SB16 Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 114

W/O REF. TO FILE SB114 Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 133

W/O REF. TO FILE SB133 B. & F.R. (Laird)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 178

W/O REF. TO FILE SB178 B. & F.R. (Laird)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 186

W/O REF. TO FILE SB186 B. & F.R. (Laird)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 195

W/O REF. TO FILE SB195 B. & F.R. (Laird)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 337

Unfinished Business SB337 Menjivar et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 423

Unfinished Business SB423 Gonzalez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 574

Unfinished Business SB574 Umberg et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 615

Unfinished Business SB615 Allen et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 715

Unfinished Business SB715 Allen Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 716

W/O REF. TO FILE SB716 Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 795

W/O REF. TO FILE SB795 Archuleta

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 867

Unfinished Business SB867 Padilla et al. Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 876

Unfinished Business SB876 Padilla et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 877

Unfinished Business SB877 Pérez et al. Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 878

Unfinished Business SB878 Pérez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 883

Unfinished Business SB883 Umberg et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 884

W/O REF. TO FILE SB884 Umberg Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 886

W/O REF. TO FILE SB886 Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 887

Unfinished Business SB887 Padilla et al. Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 895

Unfinished Business SB895 Wiener et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 903

Unfinished Business SB903 Padilla et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 907

Unfinished Business SB907 Archuleta et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 947

Unfinished Business SB947 McNerney et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 951

Unfinished Business SB951 Reyes et al. Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 960

Unfinished Business SB960 Cabaldon Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 1009

Unfinished Business SB1009 Becker et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1050

W/O REF. TO FILE SB1050 Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1057

W/O REF. TO FILE SB1057 Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1087

Unfinished Business SB1087 Cabaldon Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1119

W/O REF. TO FILE SB1119 Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1130

Unfinished Business SB1130 Reyes Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1148

Unfinished Business SB1148 Niello Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 1160

Unfinished Business SB1160 Durazo Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 1180

Unfinished Business SB1180 Allen Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1203

W/O REF. TO FILE SB1203 Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1228

W/O REF. TO FILE SB1228 Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1246

Unfinished Business SB1246 Cortese Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 1301

Unfinished Business SB1301 Allen et al. Concurrence

VoteNay
Voted Nay on SB 1342

Unfinished Business SB1342 Durazo et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1345

Unfinished Business SB1345 Wahab Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1360

Unfinished Business SB1360 Cervantes et al. Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 1365

Unfinished Business SB1365 Allen et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1369

Unfinished Business SB1369 Reyes Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1370

W/O REF. TO FILE SB1370 Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1387

W/O REF. TO FILE SB1387 Stern