Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

4,136 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1688

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1688 Carrillo et al. By Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1689

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1689 Quirk-Silva By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1693

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1693 Zbur et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1721

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1721 Muratsuchi By Ochoa Bogh

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1751

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1751 Quirk-Silva et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1753

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1753 Stefani et al. By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1766

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1766 Krell By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1770

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1770 Garcia et al. By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1804

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1804 Hart et al. By Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1811

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1811 Rogers et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1838

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1838 Berman

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1842

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1842 Harabedian et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1856

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1856 Wicks By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1857

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1857 Aguiar-Curry et al. By Richardson

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1886

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1886 Elhawary By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1889

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1889 Ramos By Rubio

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1901

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1901 Berman By McGuire

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1917

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1917 Schultz By Arreguín

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1930

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1930 Zbur et al. By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1931

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1931 Papan By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1946

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1946 Wicks et al. By Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1979

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1979 Bonta By Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2006

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2006 Michelle Rodriguez By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2007

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2007 Bauer-Kahan et al. By Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2030

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2030 Lowenthal et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2038

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2038 Harabedian et al. By Pérez

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2050

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2050 Caloza et al. By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2078

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2078 Rogers By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2089

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2089 Ward By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2113

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2113 McKinnor et al. By Richardson

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 2122

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2122 Kalra et al. By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2124

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2124 Pacheco et al. By Hurtado

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2146

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2146 Stefani et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2157

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2157 Connolly et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2166

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2166 Carrillo et al. By Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2174

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2174 Johnson By Valladares

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2181

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2181 Zbur et al. By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2185

Special Consent AB2185 Quirk-Silva et al. By Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2195

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2195 Celeste Rodriguez By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2206

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2206 Fong By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2241

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2241 Boerner et al. By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2247

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2247 Elhawary et al. By Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2270

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2270 Arambula et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2278

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2278 Ávila Farías By Ochoa Bogh

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2296

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2296 Papan By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2301

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2301 Soria By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2314

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2314 Rogers et al. By Ochoa Bogh

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2316

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2316 Hoover By Valladares

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2374

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2374 Fong et al. By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2378

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2378 Gabriel et al. By Blakespear