Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

4,169 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 501

Unfinished Business SB501 Allen Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 503

Unfinished Business SB503 Weber Pierson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 542

Unfinished Business SB542 Limón Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 742

Unfinished Business SB742 Pérez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 904

Unfinished Business SB904 Seyarto et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 948

Unfinished Business SB948 Arreguín et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 950

Unfinished Business SB950 Weber Pierson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 964

Unfinished Business SB964 Smallwood-Cuevas Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 999

Unfinished Business SB999 Weber Pierson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1012

Unfinished Business SB1012 Smallwood-Cuevas Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1023

Unfinished Business SB1023 Laird et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1023

Unfinished Business SB1023 Laird et al. Concurrence Reconsider

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1023

Unfinished Business SB1023 Laird et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1037

Unfinished Business SB1037 Weber Pierson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1117

Unfinished Business SB1117 Cervantes et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1166

Unfinished Business SB1166 Arreguín et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1218

Unfinished Business SB1218 Arreguín et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1220

Unfinished Business SB1220 Hurtado Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1261

Unfinished Business SB1261 Laird et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1267

Unfinished Business SB1267 Allen Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1279

Unfinished Business SB1279 Gonzalez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1283

Unfinished Business SB1283 Ashby Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1288

Unfinished Business SB1288 Laird et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1299

Unfinished Business SB1299 Arreguín Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1412

Unfinished Business SB1412 Rubio Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1417

Unfinished Business SB1417 Pérez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 31

Assembly 3rd Reading AB31 Ramos By Archuleta

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 686

Assembly 3rd Reading AB686 Berman et al. By Allen

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 708

Assembly 3rd Reading AB708 Valencia et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 744

Assembly 3rd Reading AB744 Michelle Rodriguez By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 760

Assembly 3rd Reading AB760 Ta et al. By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1116

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1116 Berman et al. By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1130

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1130 Berman et al. By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1180

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1180 Valencia By Niello

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1440

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1440 E.S. & T.M. (Connolly) By Allen

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1552

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1552 Jackson By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1598

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1598 Quirk-Silva By Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1632

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1632 Johnson By Archuleta

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1645

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1645 Mark González et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1713

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1713 Ransom et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1740

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1740 Zbur et al. By Allen

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1775

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1775 Ward et al. By Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1794

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1794 Ransom By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1807

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1807 Gabriel et al. By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1824

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1824 Ramos By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1847

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1847 Harabedian et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1854

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1854 Krell et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1941

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1941 Mark González et al. By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2025

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2025 Pellerin By Archuleta

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2076

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2076 Lowenthal et al. By Blakespear