Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Leticia Castillo

Leticia Castillo

Republican

State Assembly · Assembly District 58

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Leticia Castillo entered the Assembly after an unsuccessful campaign in 2022. A first-generation Mexican American born in Riverside, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while attending the Corona College of Cosmetology in 1989. She holds degrees in human services, counseling psychology, and social and behavioral studies. Prior to her election, she worked as a psychotherapist in private practice. She won Assembly District 58 on her second attempt, taking an open seat by 596 votes. Her early legislative agenda has included parental rights, transgender issues, abortion and election identification.

ROOTS AND THE JOB

Castillo was born in Riverside on April 27, 1971. In 1989, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while simultaneously attending the Corona College of Cosmetology. She holds an associate degree in social and behavioral studies from Riverside City College, a bachelor’s degree in human services from the University of Phoenix, and a master’s degree in counseling psychology from National University.

Prior to her election, Castillo was a psychotherapist in private practice. Her biography also includes Lee Pollard High School, the Corona College of Cosmetology and Riverside City College.

THE SECOND RUN

Castillo first ran for the California State Assembly in 2022. She placed third in the primary and did not reach the general election against incumbent Democrat Sabrina Cervantes. Two years later, she returned for the open race to succeed Sabrina Cervantes, who ran for the California State Senate.

The 2024 primary put Castillo against two Democratic members of the Riverside City Council, Clarissa Cervantes and Ronaldo Fierro. Castillo advanced, then defeated Clarissa Cervantes by 596 votes in the general election. Her victory was seen as a major upset in a blue-leaning district.

The outcome was attributed in part to a swing among Latino voters toward Donald Trump in the concurrent presidential election, as well as Clarissa Cervantes’ two arrests for driving under the influence. Castillo’s route to office included a second campaign, an open seat, two city councilmembers as primary opponents and a 596-vote general-election margin.

THE FIRST RECORD

In February 2025, Castillo introduced numerous anti-trans bills and promoted the parental rights movement. One proposal would state that a parent’s refusal to use a child’s preferred pronouns or chosen name, or a parent’s allowing a child to access gender-affirming health care, is not child abuse. It would also bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases.

Another bill would require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from public-school curricula, assemblies or lessons involving “transgender concepts” and receive an alternative educational activity. Castillo also introduced legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion. The anti-abortion California Family Council supported the bill.

In April 2025, she supported an unsuccessful voter ID law. The proposal would have required proof of citizenship to register to vote, government-issued identification at polling places, and the last four digits of a government identification number on absentee ballots.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Parental authority in disputes involving gender and schools is a recurring element of Castillo’s early legislative record. Her bills would bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases, state that specified parental actions involving a child’s gender identity are not child abuse, and require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from school discussions of transgender concepts.

Her early record also includes legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion, supported by the anti-abortion California Family Council. She additionally supported an unsuccessful voter ID proposal that would have imposed proof-of-citizenship and identification requirements on voter registration, polling-place voting and absentee ballots.

Taken together, Castillo’s early Assembly record includes parental-rights and transgender-related legislation, an adoption bill presented as an alternative to abortion, and support for stricter election-identification requirements. These actions followed her 596-vote victory in Assembly District 58.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 58 · 2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Leticia Castillo entered the Assembly after an unsuccessful campaign in 2022. A first-generation Mexican American born in Riverside, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while attending the Corona College of Cosmetology in 1989. She holds degrees in human services, counseling psychology, and social and behavioral studies. Prior to her election, she worked as a psychotherapist in private practice. She won Assembly District 58 on her second attempt, taking an open seat by 596 votes. Her early legislative agenda has included parental rights, transgender issues, abortion and election identification.

ROOTS AND THE JOB

Castillo was born in Riverside on April 27, 1971. In 1989, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while simultaneously attending the Corona College of Cosmetology. She holds an associate degree in social and behavioral studies from Riverside City College, a bachelor’s degree in human services from the University of Phoenix, and a master’s degree in counseling psychology from National University.

Prior to her election, Castillo was a psychotherapist in private practice. Her biography also includes Lee Pollard High School, the Corona College of Cosmetology and Riverside City College.

THE SECOND RUN

Castillo first ran for the California State Assembly in 2022. She placed third in the primary and did not reach the general election against incumbent Democrat Sabrina Cervantes. Two years later, she returned for the open race to succeed Sabrina Cervantes, who ran for the California State Senate.

The 2024 primary put Castillo against two Democratic members of the Riverside City Council, Clarissa Cervantes and Ronaldo Fierro. Castillo advanced, then defeated Clarissa Cervantes by 596 votes in the general election. Her victory was seen as a major upset in a blue-leaning district.

The outcome was attributed in part to a swing among Latino voters toward Donald Trump in the concurrent presidential election, as well as Clarissa Cervantes’ two arrests for driving under the influence. Castillo’s route to office included a second campaign, an open seat, two city councilmembers as primary opponents and a 596-vote general-election margin.

THE FIRST RECORD

In February 2025, Castillo introduced numerous anti-trans bills and promoted the parental rights movement. One proposal would state that a parent’s refusal to use a child’s preferred pronouns or chosen name, or a parent’s allowing a child to access gender-affirming health care, is not child abuse. It would also bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases.

Another bill would require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from public-school curricula, assemblies or lessons involving “transgender concepts” and receive an alternative educational activity. Castillo also introduced legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion. The anti-abortion California Family Council supported the bill.

In April 2025, she supported an unsuccessful voter ID law. The proposal would have required proof of citizenship to register to vote, government-issued identification at polling places, and the last four digits of a government identification number on absentee ballots.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Parental authority in disputes involving gender and schools is a recurring element of Castillo’s early legislative record. Her bills would bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases, state that specified parental actions involving a child’s gender identity are not child abuse, and require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from school discussions of transgender concepts.

Her early record also includes legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion, supported by the anti-abortion California Family Council. She additionally supported an unsuccessful voter ID proposal that would have imposed proof-of-citizenship and identification requirements on voter registration, polling-place voting and absentee ballots.

Taken together, Castillo’s early Assembly record includes parental-rights and transgender-related legislation, an adoption bill presented as an alternative to abortion, and support for stricter election-identification requirements. These actions followed her 596-vote victory in Assembly District 58.

The record

4,458 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 194

SCR 194 Seyarto Consent Calendar Second Day

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1443

SB 1443 Education Senate Third Reading By PATEL

VoteNay
Voted Nay on SB 1408

SB 1408 Arreguín Senate Third Reading By Ávila Farías

VoteNay
Voted Nay on SB 1406

SB 1406 McNerney Senate Third Reading By Aguiar-Curry

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 350

AB 350 Bonta Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 539

AB 539 Schiavo Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 550

AB 550 Petrie-Norris Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 708

AB 708 Valencia Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 739

AB 739 Jackson Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 762

AB 762 Irwin Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 801

AB 801 Bonta Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 864

AB 864 Ward Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 880

AB 880 Bennett Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1054

AB 1054 Gipson Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1093

AB 1093 Solache Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1180

AB 1180 Valencia Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1267

AB 1267 Pellerin Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1338

AB 1338 Solache Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1539

AB 1539 Addis Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1595

AB 1595 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1599

AB 1599 Ahrens Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1603

AB 1603 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1604

AB 1604 Stefani Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1608

AB 1608 Wilson Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1629

AB 1629 Haney Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1659

AB 1659 Ransom Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1661

AB 1661 Bryan Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1664

AB 1664 Jackson Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1665

AB 1665 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1666

AB 1666 Rogers Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1669

AB 1669 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1682

AB 1682 Hart Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1685

AB 1685 Lackey Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1688

AB 1688 Carrillo Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1693

AB 1693 Zbur Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1697

AB 1697 Kalra Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1721

AB 1721 Muratsuchi Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1751

AB 1751 Quirk-Silva Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1761

AB 1761 Rogers Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1803

AB 1803 Lowenthal Concurrence in Senate Amendments By JACKSON

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1806

AB 1806 Gabriel Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1807

AB 1807 Gabriel Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1842

AB 1842 Harabedian Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1848

AB 1848 Ransom Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1927

AB 1927 Krell Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1931

AB 1931 Papan Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1932

AB 1932 Elhawary Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1943

AB 1943 Gipson Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1946

AB 1946 Wicks Concurrence in Senate Amendments By KRELL

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1949

AB 1949 Lee Concurrence in Senate Amendments