Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Leticia Castillo

Leticia Castillo

Republican

State Assembly · Assembly District 58

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Leticia Castillo entered the Assembly after an unsuccessful campaign in 2022. A first-generation Mexican American born in Riverside, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while attending the Corona College of Cosmetology in 1989. She holds degrees in human services, counseling psychology, and social and behavioral studies. Prior to her election, she worked as a psychotherapist in private practice. She won Assembly District 58 on her second attempt, taking an open seat by 596 votes. Her early legislative agenda has included parental rights, transgender issues, abortion and election identification.

ROOTS AND THE JOB

Castillo was born in Riverside on April 27, 1971. In 1989, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while simultaneously attending the Corona College of Cosmetology. She holds an associate degree in social and behavioral studies from Riverside City College, a bachelor’s degree in human services from the University of Phoenix, and a master’s degree in counseling psychology from National University.

Prior to her election, Castillo was a psychotherapist in private practice. Her biography also includes Lee Pollard High School, the Corona College of Cosmetology and Riverside City College.

THE SECOND RUN

Castillo first ran for the California State Assembly in 2022. She placed third in the primary and did not reach the general election against incumbent Democrat Sabrina Cervantes. Two years later, she returned for the open race to succeed Sabrina Cervantes, who ran for the California State Senate.

The 2024 primary put Castillo against two Democratic members of the Riverside City Council, Clarissa Cervantes and Ronaldo Fierro. Castillo advanced, then defeated Clarissa Cervantes by 596 votes in the general election. Her victory was seen as a major upset in a blue-leaning district.

The outcome was attributed in part to a swing among Latino voters toward Donald Trump in the concurrent presidential election, as well as Clarissa Cervantes’ two arrests for driving under the influence. Castillo’s route to office included a second campaign, an open seat, two city councilmembers as primary opponents and a 596-vote general-election margin.

THE FIRST RECORD

In February 2025, Castillo introduced numerous anti-trans bills and promoted the parental rights movement. One proposal would state that a parent’s refusal to use a child’s preferred pronouns or chosen name, or a parent’s allowing a child to access gender-affirming health care, is not child abuse. It would also bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases.

Another bill would require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from public-school curricula, assemblies or lessons involving “transgender concepts” and receive an alternative educational activity. Castillo also introduced legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion. The anti-abortion California Family Council supported the bill.

In April 2025, she supported an unsuccessful voter ID law. The proposal would have required proof of citizenship to register to vote, government-issued identification at polling places, and the last four digits of a government identification number on absentee ballots.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Parental authority in disputes involving gender and schools is a recurring element of Castillo’s early legislative record. Her bills would bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases, state that specified parental actions involving a child’s gender identity are not child abuse, and require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from school discussions of transgender concepts.

Her early record also includes legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion, supported by the anti-abortion California Family Council. She additionally supported an unsuccessful voter ID proposal that would have imposed proof-of-citizenship and identification requirements on voter registration, polling-place voting and absentee ballots.

Taken together, Castillo’s early Assembly record includes parental-rights and transgender-related legislation, an adoption bill presented as an alternative to abortion, and support for stricter election-identification requirements. These actions followed her 596-vote victory in Assembly District 58.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 58 · 2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Leticia Castillo entered the Assembly after an unsuccessful campaign in 2022. A first-generation Mexican American born in Riverside, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while attending the Corona College of Cosmetology in 1989. She holds degrees in human services, counseling psychology, and social and behavioral studies. Prior to her election, she worked as a psychotherapist in private practice. She won Assembly District 58 on her second attempt, taking an open seat by 596 votes. Her early legislative agenda has included parental rights, transgender issues, abortion and election identification.

ROOTS AND THE JOB

Castillo was born in Riverside on April 27, 1971. In 1989, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while simultaneously attending the Corona College of Cosmetology. She holds an associate degree in social and behavioral studies from Riverside City College, a bachelor’s degree in human services from the University of Phoenix, and a master’s degree in counseling psychology from National University.

Prior to her election, Castillo was a psychotherapist in private practice. Her biography also includes Lee Pollard High School, the Corona College of Cosmetology and Riverside City College.

THE SECOND RUN

Castillo first ran for the California State Assembly in 2022. She placed third in the primary and did not reach the general election against incumbent Democrat Sabrina Cervantes. Two years later, she returned for the open race to succeed Sabrina Cervantes, who ran for the California State Senate.

The 2024 primary put Castillo against two Democratic members of the Riverside City Council, Clarissa Cervantes and Ronaldo Fierro. Castillo advanced, then defeated Clarissa Cervantes by 596 votes in the general election. Her victory was seen as a major upset in a blue-leaning district.

The outcome was attributed in part to a swing among Latino voters toward Donald Trump in the concurrent presidential election, as well as Clarissa Cervantes’ two arrests for driving under the influence. Castillo’s route to office included a second campaign, an open seat, two city councilmembers as primary opponents and a 596-vote general-election margin.

THE FIRST RECORD

In February 2025, Castillo introduced numerous anti-trans bills and promoted the parental rights movement. One proposal would state that a parent’s refusal to use a child’s preferred pronouns or chosen name, or a parent’s allowing a child to access gender-affirming health care, is not child abuse. It would also bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases.

Another bill would require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from public-school curricula, assemblies or lessons involving “transgender concepts” and receive an alternative educational activity. Castillo also introduced legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion. The anti-abortion California Family Council supported the bill.

In April 2025, she supported an unsuccessful voter ID law. The proposal would have required proof of citizenship to register to vote, government-issued identification at polling places, and the last four digits of a government identification number on absentee ballots.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Parental authority in disputes involving gender and schools is a recurring element of Castillo’s early legislative record. Her bills would bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases, state that specified parental actions involving a child’s gender identity are not child abuse, and require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from school discussions of transgender concepts.

Her early record also includes legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion, supported by the anti-abortion California Family Council. She additionally supported an unsuccessful voter ID proposal that would have imposed proof-of-citizenship and identification requirements on voter registration, polling-place voting and absentee ballots.

Taken together, Castillo’s early Assembly record includes parental-rights and transgender-related legislation, an adoption bill presented as an alternative to abortion, and support for stricter election-identification requirements. These actions followed her 596-vote victory in Assembly District 58.

The record

4,262 events, each with its source
VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 30

SCR 30 Smallwood-Cuevas Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 21

SCR 21 Smallwood-Cuevas Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 20

SCR 20 Ochoa Bogh Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 100

AB 100 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 414

AB 414 Pellerin Consent Calendar Second Day

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 32

ACR 32 Carrillo Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 248

AB 248 Bryan Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 219

AB 219 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 218

AB 218 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 217

AB 217 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 216

AB 216 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 215

AB 215 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 214

AB 214 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 213

AB 213 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 212

AB 212 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 211

AB 211 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 210

AB 210 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 209

AB 209 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 207

AB 207 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 206

AB 206 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 205

AB 205 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 204

AB 204 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 203

AB 203 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 202

AB 202 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 201

AB 201 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 200

AB 200 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 199

AB 199 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 198

AB 198 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 197

AB 197 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 196

AB 196 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 195

AB 195 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 194

AB 194 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 193

AB 193 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 192

AB 192 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 191

AB 191 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 190

AB 190 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 189

AB 189 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 188

AB 188 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 187

AB 187 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 186

AB 186 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 185

AB 185 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 184

AB 184 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 183

AB 183 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 182

AB 182 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 181

AB 181 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 180

AB 180 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 179

AB 179 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 178

AB 178 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 177

AB 177 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 176

AB 176 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading