Leticia Castillo entered the Assembly after an unsuccessful campaign in 2022. A first-generation Mexican American born in Riverside, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while attending the Corona College of Cosmetology in 1989. She holds degrees in human services, counseling psychology, and social and behavioral studies. Prior to her election, she worked as a psychotherapist in private practice. She won Assembly District 58 on her second attempt, taking an open seat by 596 votes. Her early legislative agenda has included parental rights, transgender issues, abortion and election identification.
ROOTS AND THE JOB
Castillo was born in Riverside on April 27, 1971. In 1989, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while simultaneously attending the Corona College of Cosmetology. She holds an associate degree in social and behavioral studies from Riverside City College, a bachelor’s degree in human services from the University of Phoenix, and a master’s degree in counseling psychology from National University.
Prior to her election, Castillo was a psychotherapist in private practice. Her biography also includes Lee Pollard High School, the Corona College of Cosmetology and Riverside City College.
THE SECOND RUN
Castillo first ran for the California State Assembly in 2022. She placed third in the primary and did not reach the general election against incumbent Democrat Sabrina Cervantes. Two years later, she returned for the open race to succeed Sabrina Cervantes, who ran for the California State Senate.
The 2024 primary put Castillo against two Democratic members of the Riverside City Council, Clarissa Cervantes and Ronaldo Fierro. Castillo advanced, then defeated Clarissa Cervantes by 596 votes in the general election. Her victory was seen as a major upset in a blue-leaning district.
The outcome was attributed in part to a swing among Latino voters toward Donald Trump in the concurrent presidential election, as well as Clarissa Cervantes’ two arrests for driving under the influence. Castillo’s route to office included a second campaign, an open seat, two city councilmembers as primary opponents and a 596-vote general-election margin.
THE FIRST RECORD
In February 2025, Castillo introduced numerous anti-trans bills and promoted the parental rights movement. One proposal would state that a parent’s refusal to use a child’s preferred pronouns or chosen name, or a parent’s allowing a child to access gender-affirming health care, is not child abuse. It would also bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases.
Another bill would require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from public-school curricula, assemblies or lessons involving “transgender concepts” and receive an alternative educational activity. Castillo also introduced legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion. The anti-abortion California Family Council supported the bill.
In April 2025, she supported an unsuccessful voter ID law. The proposal would have required proof of citizenship to register to vote, government-issued identification at polling places, and the last four digits of a government identification number on absentee ballots.
THE POLICY SIGNATURE
Parental authority in disputes involving gender and schools is a recurring element of Castillo’s early legislative record. Her bills would bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases, state that specified parental actions involving a child’s gender identity are not child abuse, and require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from school discussions of transgender concepts.
Her early record also includes legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion, supported by the anti-abortion California Family Council. She additionally supported an unsuccessful voter ID proposal that would have imposed proof-of-citizenship and identification requirements on voter registration, polling-place voting and absentee ballots.
Taken together, Castillo’s early Assembly record includes parental-rights and transgender-related legislation, an adoption bill presented as an alternative to abortion, and support for stricter election-identification requirements. These actions followed her 596-vote victory in Assembly District 58.
- State Assembly · Assembly District 58 · 2024–present
Leticia Castillo entered the Assembly after an unsuccessful campaign in 2022. A first-generation Mexican American born in Riverside, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while attending the Corona College of Cosmetology in 1989. She holds degrees in human services, counseling psychology, and social and behavioral studies. Prior to her election, she worked as a psychotherapist in private practice. She won Assembly District 58 on her second attempt, taking an open seat by 596 votes. Her early legislative agenda has included parental rights, transgender issues, abortion and election identification.
ROOTS AND THE JOB
Castillo was born in Riverside on April 27, 1971. In 1989, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while simultaneously attending the Corona College of Cosmetology. She holds an associate degree in social and behavioral studies from Riverside City College, a bachelor’s degree in human services from the University of Phoenix, and a master’s degree in counseling psychology from National University.
Prior to her election, Castillo was a psychotherapist in private practice. Her biography also includes Lee Pollard High School, the Corona College of Cosmetology and Riverside City College.
THE SECOND RUN
Castillo first ran for the California State Assembly in 2022. She placed third in the primary and did not reach the general election against incumbent Democrat Sabrina Cervantes. Two years later, she returned for the open race to succeed Sabrina Cervantes, who ran for the California State Senate.
The 2024 primary put Castillo against two Democratic members of the Riverside City Council, Clarissa Cervantes and Ronaldo Fierro. Castillo advanced, then defeated Clarissa Cervantes by 596 votes in the general election. Her victory was seen as a major upset in a blue-leaning district.
The outcome was attributed in part to a swing among Latino voters toward Donald Trump in the concurrent presidential election, as well as Clarissa Cervantes’ two arrests for driving under the influence. Castillo’s route to office included a second campaign, an open seat, two city councilmembers as primary opponents and a 596-vote general-election margin.
THE FIRST RECORD
In February 2025, Castillo introduced numerous anti-trans bills and promoted the parental rights movement. One proposal would state that a parent’s refusal to use a child’s preferred pronouns or chosen name, or a parent’s allowing a child to access gender-affirming health care, is not child abuse. It would also bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases.
Another bill would require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from public-school curricula, assemblies or lessons involving “transgender concepts” and receive an alternative educational activity. Castillo also introduced legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion. The anti-abortion California Family Council supported the bill.
In April 2025, she supported an unsuccessful voter ID law. The proposal would have required proof of citizenship to register to vote, government-issued identification at polling places, and the last four digits of a government identification number on absentee ballots.
THE POLICY SIGNATURE
Parental authority in disputes involving gender and schools is a recurring element of Castillo’s early legislative record. Her bills would bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases, state that specified parental actions involving a child’s gender identity are not child abuse, and require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from school discussions of transgender concepts.
Her early record also includes legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion, supported by the anti-abortion California Family Council. She additionally supported an unsuccessful voter ID proposal that would have imposed proof-of-citizenship and identification requirements on voter registration, polling-place voting and absentee ballots.
Taken together, Castillo’s early Assembly record includes parental-rights and transgender-related legislation, an adoption bill presented as an alternative to abortion, and support for stricter election-identification requirements. These actions followed her 596-vote victory in Assembly District 58.
The record
4,865 events, each with its sourceSB 259 Wahab Third Reading Urgency By Pellerin
SB 690 Caballero Senate Third Reading By BAUER-KAHAN
SB 811 Caballero Senate Third Reading By Blanca Rubio
SB 1078 Laird Senate Third Reading By Pellerin
SB 1090 Pérez Third Reading Urgency By Harabedian
SB 1111 Ashby Senate Third Reading By Bauer-Kahan
SB 1168 McNerney Senate Third Reading By Rogers
AB 280 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments
With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in
AB 306 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 395 Gabriel Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 464 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 643 Wilson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 672 Caloza Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 685 Solache Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 706 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 750 Quirk-Silva Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 883 Lowenthal Concurrence in Senate Amendments By RODRIGUEZ, C
AB 939 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 956 Quirk-Silva Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1049 Celeste Rodriguez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1165 Gipson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in
AB 1381 Muratsuchi Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1439 Garcia Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1448 Hart Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1457 Bryan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1519 Gipson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1577 Bauer-Kahan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1615 Nguyen Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1626 Gabriel Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1641 Jackson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1650 Caloza Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1679 Mark González Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1689 Quirk-Silva Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1731 Wilson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1753 Stefani Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1755 Sharp-Collins Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1766 Krell Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1770 Garcia Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1836 Gabriel Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1838 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1856 Wicks Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1857 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1886 Elhawary Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1889 Ramos Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1891 Connolly Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1901 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1917 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1918 Dixon Concurrence in Senate Amendments