Leticia Castillo entered the Assembly after an unsuccessful campaign in 2022. A first-generation Mexican American born in Riverside, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while attending the Corona College of Cosmetology in 1989. She holds degrees in human services, counseling psychology, and social and behavioral studies. Prior to her election, she worked as a psychotherapist in private practice. She won Assembly District 58 on her second attempt, taking an open seat by 596 votes. Her early legislative agenda has included parental rights, transgender issues, abortion and election identification.
ROOTS AND THE JOB
Castillo was born in Riverside on April 27, 1971. In 1989, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while simultaneously attending the Corona College of Cosmetology. She holds an associate degree in social and behavioral studies from Riverside City College, a bachelor’s degree in human services from the University of Phoenix, and a master’s degree in counseling psychology from National University.
Prior to her election, Castillo was a psychotherapist in private practice. Her biography also includes Lee Pollard High School, the Corona College of Cosmetology and Riverside City College.
THE SECOND RUN
Castillo first ran for the California State Assembly in 2022. She placed third in the primary and did not reach the general election against incumbent Democrat Sabrina Cervantes. Two years later, she returned for the open race to succeed Sabrina Cervantes, who ran for the California State Senate.
The 2024 primary put Castillo against two Democratic members of the Riverside City Council, Clarissa Cervantes and Ronaldo Fierro. Castillo advanced, then defeated Clarissa Cervantes by 596 votes in the general election. Her victory was seen as a major upset in a blue-leaning district.
The outcome was attributed in part to a swing among Latino voters toward Donald Trump in the concurrent presidential election, as well as Clarissa Cervantes’ two arrests for driving under the influence. Castillo’s route to office included a second campaign, an open seat, two city councilmembers as primary opponents and a 596-vote general-election margin.
THE FIRST RECORD
In February 2025, Castillo introduced numerous anti-trans bills and promoted the parental rights movement. One proposal would state that a parent’s refusal to use a child’s preferred pronouns or chosen name, or a parent’s allowing a child to access gender-affirming health care, is not child abuse. It would also bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases.
Another bill would require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from public-school curricula, assemblies or lessons involving “transgender concepts” and receive an alternative educational activity. Castillo also introduced legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion. The anti-abortion California Family Council supported the bill.
In April 2025, she supported an unsuccessful voter ID law. The proposal would have required proof of citizenship to register to vote, government-issued identification at polling places, and the last four digits of a government identification number on absentee ballots.
THE POLICY SIGNATURE
Parental authority in disputes involving gender and schools is a recurring element of Castillo’s early legislative record. Her bills would bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases, state that specified parental actions involving a child’s gender identity are not child abuse, and require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from school discussions of transgender concepts.
Her early record also includes legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion, supported by the anti-abortion California Family Council. She additionally supported an unsuccessful voter ID proposal that would have imposed proof-of-citizenship and identification requirements on voter registration, polling-place voting and absentee ballots.
Taken together, Castillo’s early Assembly record includes parental-rights and transgender-related legislation, an adoption bill presented as an alternative to abortion, and support for stricter election-identification requirements. These actions followed her 596-vote victory in Assembly District 58.
- State Assembly · Assembly District 58 · 2024–present
Leticia Castillo entered the Assembly after an unsuccessful campaign in 2022. A first-generation Mexican American born in Riverside, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while attending the Corona College of Cosmetology in 1989. She holds degrees in human services, counseling psychology, and social and behavioral studies. Prior to her election, she worked as a psychotherapist in private practice. She won Assembly District 58 on her second attempt, taking an open seat by 596 votes. Her early legislative agenda has included parental rights, transgender issues, abortion and election identification.
ROOTS AND THE JOB
Castillo was born in Riverside on April 27, 1971. In 1989, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while simultaneously attending the Corona College of Cosmetology. She holds an associate degree in social and behavioral studies from Riverside City College, a bachelor’s degree in human services from the University of Phoenix, and a master’s degree in counseling psychology from National University.
Prior to her election, Castillo was a psychotherapist in private practice. Her biography also includes Lee Pollard High School, the Corona College of Cosmetology and Riverside City College.
THE SECOND RUN
Castillo first ran for the California State Assembly in 2022. She placed third in the primary and did not reach the general election against incumbent Democrat Sabrina Cervantes. Two years later, she returned for the open race to succeed Sabrina Cervantes, who ran for the California State Senate.
The 2024 primary put Castillo against two Democratic members of the Riverside City Council, Clarissa Cervantes and Ronaldo Fierro. Castillo advanced, then defeated Clarissa Cervantes by 596 votes in the general election. Her victory was seen as a major upset in a blue-leaning district.
The outcome was attributed in part to a swing among Latino voters toward Donald Trump in the concurrent presidential election, as well as Clarissa Cervantes’ two arrests for driving under the influence. Castillo’s route to office included a second campaign, an open seat, two city councilmembers as primary opponents and a 596-vote general-election margin.
THE FIRST RECORD
In February 2025, Castillo introduced numerous anti-trans bills and promoted the parental rights movement. One proposal would state that a parent’s refusal to use a child’s preferred pronouns or chosen name, or a parent’s allowing a child to access gender-affirming health care, is not child abuse. It would also bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases.
Another bill would require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from public-school curricula, assemblies or lessons involving “transgender concepts” and receive an alternative educational activity. Castillo also introduced legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion. The anti-abortion California Family Council supported the bill.
In April 2025, she supported an unsuccessful voter ID law. The proposal would have required proof of citizenship to register to vote, government-issued identification at polling places, and the last four digits of a government identification number on absentee ballots.
THE POLICY SIGNATURE
Parental authority in disputes involving gender and schools is a recurring element of Castillo’s early legislative record. Her bills would bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases, state that specified parental actions involving a child’s gender identity are not child abuse, and require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from school discussions of transgender concepts.
Her early record also includes legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion, supported by the anti-abortion California Family Council. She additionally supported an unsuccessful voter ID proposal that would have imposed proof-of-citizenship and identification requirements on voter registration, polling-place voting and absentee ballots.
Taken together, Castillo’s early Assembly record includes parental-rights and transgender-related legislation, an adoption bill presented as an alternative to abortion, and support for stricter election-identification requirements. These actions followed her 596-vote victory in Assembly District 58.
The record
4,458 events, each with its sourceAB 1598 Quirk-Silva Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1621 Wilson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1645 Mark González Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1655 Bryan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1703 Hart Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1713 Ransom Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1728 Alanis Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1732 Alvarez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1740 Zbur Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1775 Ward Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1794 Ransom Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1801 Lee Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1821 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1824 Ramos Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1847 Harabedian Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1905 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1941 Mark González Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1973 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1991 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1997 Lee Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2008 Patel Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2024 Nguyen Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2025 Pellerin Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2076 Lowenthal Concurrence in Senate Amendments By RODRIGUEZ, C
AB 2128 Haney Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2172 Gipson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2305 Kalra Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2308 Haney Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2343 Patel Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2348 Bonta Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2361 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2395 Sharp-Collins Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2480 Ávila Farías Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2483 Elhawary Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2534 Kalra Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2543 Ransom Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2577 Connolly Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2593 Elhawary Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2594 Lowenthal Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2647 Calderon Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2656 Petrie-Norris Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2663 Rogers Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2691 Addis Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2731 Addis Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2774 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2777 Environmental Safety and Concurrence in Senate Amendments By CONNOLLY
AB 2785 Elections Concurrence in Senate Amendments By PELLERIN
AB 2787 Water, Parks, and Wildli Concurrence in Senate Amendments By PAPAN
SB 299 Cabaldon Senate Third Reading By Wicks
SB 329 Blakespear Senate Third Reading By Dixon