Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Greg Wallis

Greg Wallis

Republican

State Assembly · Assembly District 47

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.

THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB

Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.

In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.

That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.

TWO CLOSE RACES

Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.

By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.

The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.

THE POLICY RECORD

Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.

No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.

For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · 2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.

THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB

Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.

In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.

That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.

TWO CLOSE RACES

Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.

By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.

The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.

THE POLICY RECORD

Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.

No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.

For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.

The record

4,396 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 113

AB 113 GABRIEL Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1128

AB 1128 Muratsuchi Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 931

SB 931 Grove Third Reading Urgency By Krell

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 28

AB 28 Schiavo Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 187

AB 187 BUDGET Concurrence in Senate Amendments By GABRIEL

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 190

AB 190 BUDGET Concurrence in Senate Amendments By GABRIEL

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 192

AB 192 BUDGET Concurrence in Senate Amendments By GABRIEL

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 353

AB 353 BOERNER Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 605

AB 605 Muratsuchi Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 611

AB 611 LEE Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 664

AB 664 Alvarez Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 760

AB 760 Ta Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 817

AB 817 GONZÁLEZ, M. Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 904

AB 904 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1099

AB 1099 Bryan Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1156

AB 1156 WICKS Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1159

AB 1159 Addis Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1199

AB 1199 Patterson Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1294

AB 1294 Haney Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1301

AB 1301 PETRIE-NORRIS Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1307

AB 1307 Ávila Farías Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1331

AB 1331 Elhawary Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1349

AB 1349 BRYAN Concurrence in Senate Amendments Move The Previous Question By AGUIAR-CURRY

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1349

AB 1349 BRYAN Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1546

AB 1546 SCHULTZ Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1575

AB 1575 Arambula Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1609

AB 1609 Zbur Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1642

AB 1642 HARABEDIAN Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1646

AB 1646 Bryan Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1680

AB 1680 Calderon Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1707

AB 1707 Davies Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1709

AB 1709 Lowenthal Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1795

AB 1795 GIPSON Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1813

AB 1813 Ward Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1816

AB 1816 Davies Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1841

AB 1841 Ramos Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1871

AB 1871 Fong Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1896

AB 1896 GONZÁLEZ, M. Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1969

AB 1969 BONTA Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1976

AB 1976 Wicks Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1981

AB 1981 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2012

AB 2012 Hoover Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2020

AB 2020 Gabriel Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 2047

AB 2047 Bauer-Kahan Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2059

AB 2059 Wilson Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2061

AB 2061 Chen Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2065

AB 2065 Petrie-Norris Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2071

AB 2071 Hoover Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2086

AB 2086 Ellis Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2103

AB 2103 Irwin Concurrence in Senate Amendments