
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
- State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · 2022–present
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
The record
3,986 events, each with its sourceSCR 194 Seyarto Consent Calendar Second Day
SB 1443 Education Senate Third Reading By PATEL
SB 1408 Arreguín Senate Third Reading By Ávila Farías
SB 1406 McNerney Senate Third Reading By Aguiar-Curry
SB 1401 Stern Senate Third Reading By Schultz
SB 1374 Niello Senate Third Reading By Sharp-Collins
SB 1359 Stern Senate Third Reading By Berman
SB 1344 Cabaldon Senate Third Reading By Haney
SB 1340 Richardson Senate Third Reading By Caloza
SB 1304 Wahab Senate Third Reading By Berman
SB 1302 Wahab Senate Third Reading By Berman
SB 1268 Gonzalez Senate Third Reading By Bryan
SB 1247 Padilla Senate Third Reading By Bauer-Kahan
AB 350 Bonta Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 539 Schiavo Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 550 Petrie-Norris Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 708 Valencia Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 739 Jackson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 762 Irwin Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 801 Bonta Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 864 Ward Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 880 Bennett Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1054 Gipson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1093 Solache Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1180 Valencia Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1267 Pellerin Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1338 Solache Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1539 Addis Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1595 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1599 Ahrens Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1603 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1604 Stefani Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1608 Wilson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1629 Haney Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1659 Ransom Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1661 Bryan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1664 Jackson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1665 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1666 Rogers Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1669 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1682 Hart Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1685 Lackey Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1688 Carrillo Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1693 Zbur Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1697 Kalra Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1721 Muratsuchi Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1751 Quirk-Silva Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1761 Rogers Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1803 Lowenthal Concurrence in Senate Amendments By JACKSON
AB 1806 Gabriel Concurrence in Senate Amendments