Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Greg Wallis

Greg Wallis

Republican

State Assembly · Assembly District 47

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.

THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB

Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.

In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.

That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.

TWO CLOSE RACES

Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.

By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.

The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.

THE POLICY RECORD

Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.

No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.

For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · 2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.

THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB

Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.

In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.

That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.

TWO CLOSE RACES

Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.

By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.

The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.

THE POLICY RECORD

Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.

No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.

For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.

The record

4,801 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1901

AB 1901 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1917

AB 1917 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1918

AB 1918 Dixon Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1924

AB 1924 Gabriel Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1930

AB 1930 Zbur Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1967

AB 1967 Zbur Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1979

AB 1979 Bonta Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2007

AB 2007 Bauer-Kahan Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2030

AB 2030 Lowenthal Concurrence in Senate Amendments By RODRIGUEZ, C

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2113

AB 2113 McKinnor Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2124

AB 2124 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 2157

AB 2157 Connolly Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2166

AB 2166 Carrillo Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 2168

AB 2168 Wicks Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2173

AB 2173 Wallis Concurrence - Urgency Added

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2181

AB 2181 Zbur Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2195

AB 2195 Celeste Rodriguez Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2206

AB 2206 Fong Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 2270

AB 2270 Arambula Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2282

AB 2282 Alanis Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2298

AB 2298 Irwin Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2304

AB 2304 Lackey Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2378

AB 2378 Gabriel Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 2405

AB 2405 Gipson Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2411

AB 2411 McKINNOR Concurrence in Senate Amendments By ELHAWARY

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2468

AB 2468 Patel Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2471

AB 2471 E.M. Concurrence in Senate Amendments By RANSOM

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 2494

AB 2494 Rogers Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2499

AB 2499 Gipson Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2507

AB 2507 Nguyen Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2532

AB 2532 Irwin Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2539

AB 2539 Ramos Concurrence - Urgency Added

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2555

AB 2555 Patel Concurrence - Urgency Added

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2571

AB 2571 Flora Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2613

AB 2613 Sharp-Collins Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 2619

AB 2619 Papan Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2635

AB 2635 Celeste Rodriguez Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2728

AB 2728 Soria Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2764

AB 2764 Ahrens Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2772

AB 2772 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2795

AB 2795 B. & F. Concurrence in Senate Amendments By VALENCIA

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 58

SB 58 Padilla Senate Third Reading By Alvarez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 99

SB 99 Blakespear Senate Third Reading By Stefani

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 327

SB 327 McNerney Senate Third Reading By Berman

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 354

SB 354 Limón Senate Third Reading By Bauer-Kahan

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 691

SB 691 Wahab Senate Third Reading By Schultz

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 750

SB 750 Cortese Senate Third Reading By Haney

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 869

SB 869 Weber Pierson Senate Third Reading By Gabriel

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1072

SB 1072 Housing Senate Third Reading By HANEY

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1128

SB 1128 Stern Senate Third Reading By Wicks