
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
- State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · 2022–present
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
The record
4,801 events, each with its sourceAB 2439 Blanca Rubio Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2477 Chen Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2674 Schiavo Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2713 Wicks Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2782 Judiciary Concurrence in Senate Amendments By KALRA
SB 259 Wahab Third Reading Urgency By Pellerin
SB 690 Caballero Senate Third Reading By BAUER-KAHAN
SB 811 Caballero Senate Third Reading By Blanca Rubio
SB 1078 Laird Senate Third Reading By Pellerin
SB 1090 Pérez Third Reading Urgency By Harabedian
SB 1111 Ashby Senate Third Reading By Bauer-Kahan
SB 1168 McNerney Senate Third Reading By Rogers
AB 280 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 306 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 395 Gabriel Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 464 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 643 Wilson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 672 Caloza Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 685 Solache Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 706 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 750 Quirk-Silva Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 883 Lowenthal Concurrence in Senate Amendments By RODRIGUEZ, C
AB 939 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 956 Quirk-Silva Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1049 Celeste Rodriguez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1165 Gipson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1381 Muratsuchi Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1439 Garcia Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1448 Hart Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1457 Bryan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1519 Gipson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1577 Bauer-Kahan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1615 Nguyen Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1626 Gabriel Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1641 Jackson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1650 Caloza Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1679 Mark González Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1689 Quirk-Silva Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1731 Wilson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1753 Stefani Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1755 Sharp-Collins Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1766 Krell Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1770 Garcia Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1836 Gabriel Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1838 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1856 Wicks Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1857 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1886 Elhawary Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1889 Ramos Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1891 Connolly Concurrence in Senate Amendments