
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
- State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · 2022–present
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
The record
4,396 events, each with its sourceSB 1180 Allen Senate Third Reading By Bryan
SB 1158 Stern Senate Third Reading By Schultz
SB 1130 Reyes Senate Third Reading By Bauer-Kahan
AB 69 Calderon Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 220 Jackson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 282 Pellerin Concurrence - Urgency Added
With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in
AB 387 Alanis Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 502 Pellerin Concurrence - Urgency Added
AB 540 Connolly Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 686 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 767 Alanis Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 788 Quirk-Silva Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 917 Ávila Farías Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 929 Connolly Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1039 Hart Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1130 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1198 Haney Concurrence in Senate Amendments
With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in
AB 1383 McKinnor Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1405 Bauer-Kahan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1537 Bryan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1542 Ward Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1555 Hadwick Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1572 Alanis Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1578 Jackson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1588 Stefani Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1600 Arambula Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1627 Ávila Farías Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1687 Lackey Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1699 Rogers Concurrence - Urgency Added
AB 1715 Schiavo Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1776 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1811 Rogers Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1815 Wicks Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1843 Elhawary Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1853 Pellerin Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1881 Ramos Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1883 Bryan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1887 Zbur Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1902 Pellerin Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1934 Bennett Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1960 Bennett Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1974 Stefani Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2009 Chen Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2017 Haney Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2028 Chen Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2032 Ransom Concurrence in Senate Amendments