
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
- State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · 2022–present
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
The record
4,396 events, each with its sourceAB 2163 Jeff Gonzalez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2167 Macedo Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2204 Gabriel Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2222 Ward Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2225 Patel Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2234 Papan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2294 Ta Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2316 Hoover Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2320 Ta Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2321 Ortega Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2344 HANEY Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2372 Hoover Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2383 ZBUR Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2414 NGUYEN Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2437 Chen Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2440 Muratsuchi Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2469 Papan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2476 Ellis Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2478 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2493 Petrie-Norris Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2542 Patterson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2551 Elhawary Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2575 ORTEGA Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2694 Alvarez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2700 PATTERSON Concurrence in Senate Amendments By PATTERSON
AB 2717 CALOZA Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2727 Nguyen Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2760 Sharp-Collins Concurrence in Senate Amendments
SB 16 Blakespear Senate Third Reading By Krell
SB 114 Laird Senate Third Reading By GABRIEL
SB 133 Budget and Fiscal Review Senate Third Reading
SB 178 Budget and Fiscal Review Senate Third Reading By GABRIEL
SB 186 Budget and Fiscal Review Senate Third Reading By GABRIEL
SB 195 Budget and Fiscal Review Senate Third Reading By GABRIEL
SB 337 Menjivar Senate Third Reading By Aguiar-Curry
SB 574 Umberg Senate Third Reading By Bauer-Kahan
SB 716 Durazo Senate Third Reading By Mark González
SB 795 Archuleta Senate Third Reading By ALVAREZ
SB 867 Padilla Senate Third Reading By Lowenthal
SB 876 Padilla Senate Third Reading By Calderon
SB 878 Pérez Senate Third Reading By Harabedian
SB 883 Umberg Senate Third Reading By Quirk-Silva
SB 884 Umberg Third Reading Urgency By Valencia
SB 886 Padilla Senate Third Reading By Papan
SB 887 Padilla Senate Third Reading By Connolly
SB 895 Wiener Third Reading Urgency By Solache
SB 951 Reyes Senate Third Reading By Bryan
SB 960 Cabaldon Senate Third Reading By Alvarez
SB 1050 Ashby Senate Third Reading By Elhawary
SB 1057 Becker Senate Third Reading By Bonta