
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
- State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · 2022–present
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
The record
4,390 events, each with its sourceAB 1806 Gabriel Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1807 Gabriel Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1842 Harabedian Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1848 Ransom Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1927 Krell Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1931 Papan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1932 Elhawary Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1943 Gipson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1946 Wicks Concurrence in Senate Amendments By KRELL
AB 1949 Lee Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1961 Ahrens Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1980 Caloza Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1987 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1994 Alvarez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2006 Michelle Rodriguez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2039 Zbur Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2041 Carrillo Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2045 Connolly Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2050 Caloza Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2054 Gipson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2066 Celeste Rodriguez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2078 Rogers Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2089 Ward Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2111 Papan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2115 Ramos Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2146 Stefani Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2150 Haney Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2161 Bonta Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2185 Quirk-Silva Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2194 Valencia Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2218 Kalra Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2230 Ávila Farías Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2241 Boerner Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2247 Elhawary Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2250 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2251 Celeste Rodriguez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2257 Hart Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2273 Bains Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2290 Lackey Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2296 Papan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2311 Schiavo Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2314 Rogers Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2332 Mark González Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2374 Fong Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2392 Fong Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2409 Valencia Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2429 Blanca Rubio Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2460 Celeste Rodriguez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2463 Petrie-Norris Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2465 Ortega Concurrence in Senate Amendments