
Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.
BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE
Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.
That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.
THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST
In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.
Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.
She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.
Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.
DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP
Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.
The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.
Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.
The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.
THE MOVE TO THE SENATE
Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.
The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.
She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.
THE POLICY SIGNATURE
Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.
Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.
Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.
The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.
What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.
- State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · former
- State Senate · Senate District 29 · 2024–present
- State Assembly · Assembly District 50 · 2022–
Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.
BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE
Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.
That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.
THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST
In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.
Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.
She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.
Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.
DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP
Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.
The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.
Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.
The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.
THE MOVE TO THE SENATE
Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.
The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.
She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.
THE POLICY SIGNATURE
Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.
Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.
Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.
The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.
What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.
The record
3,985 events, each with its sourceUnfinished Business SB1425 Cortese Concurrence
Unfinished Business SB1414 Reyes et al. Concurrence
Assembly 3rd Reading AB96 Jackson By Pérez
Assembly 3rd Reading AB264 Carrillo et al. By Archuleta
Assembly 3rd Reading AB280 Aguiar-Curry et al. By Padilla
Assembly 3rd Reading AB306 Schultz et al. By Pérez
Assembly 3rd Reading AB312 Alanis By Alvarado-Gil
Assembly 3rd Reading AB350 Bonta et al. By Rubio
Assembly 3rd Reading AB353 Boerner By Becker
Assembly 3rd Reading AB464 Aguiar-Curry et al. By Menjivar
That the measure be returned to Senate Floor for consideration. Ordered to third reading
Assembly 3rd Reading AB611 Lee By McNerney
Assembly 3rd Reading AB685 Solache et al. By Hurtado
Assembly 3rd Reading AB706 Aguiar-Curry et al. By Grayson
Assembly 3rd Reading AB864 Ward By Allen
Assembly 3rd Reading AB883 Lowenthal et al. By Cabaldon
Assembly 3rd Reading AB939 Schultz et al. By Caballero
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1049 Celeste Rodriguez By Gonzalez
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1054 Gipson et al. By Cortese
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1128 Muratsuchi et al. By Allen
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1165 Gipson et al. By Arreguín
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1184 Patterson et al. By Menjivar
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1294 Haney et al. By Arreguín
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1338 Solache By Rubio
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1381 Muratsuchi By Pérez
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1439 Garcia et al
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1448 Hart et al. By Blakespear
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1457 Bryan By Reyes
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1547 Bains By Hurtado Urgency Clause
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1577 Bauer-Kahan By McGuire
That the measure be returned to Senate Floor for consideration. Ordered to third reading
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1595 Schultz By Cortese
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1599 Ahrens et al. By Cortese
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1603 Schultz By Gonzalez
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1608 Wilson By Wiener
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1615 Nguyen et al. By Arreguín
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1626 Gabriel et al. By Stern
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1628 Michelle Rodriguez By Umberg
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1629 Haney et al. By Gonzalez
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1641 Jackson et al. By Cervantes
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1663 Wallis et al. By Valladares
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1666 Rogers By McNerney
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1679 Mark González et al. By Durazo
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1682 Hart et al. By Rubio
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1685 Lackey et al. By Archuleta
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1688 Carrillo et al. By Wahab
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1689 Quirk-Silva By Cortese
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1693 Zbur et al. By Grayson
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1721 Muratsuchi By Ochoa Bogh
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1751 Quirk-Silva et al. By Arreguín