Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Eloise Reyes

Eloise Reyes

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 29

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · former
  • State Senate · Senate District 29 · 2024–present
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 50 · 2022–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

The record

3,985 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2477

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2477 Chen By Valladares

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2480

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2480 Ávila Farías et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2486

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2486 Addis By Blakespear

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2490

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2490 Valencia et al. By Caballero

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2495

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2495 Kalra et al. By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2499

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2499 Gipson By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2502

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2502 Pellerin et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2510

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2510 Arambula By Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2531

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2531 Irwin et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2541

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2541 Mark González et al. By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2571

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2571 Flora By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2589

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2589 Irwin et al. By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2599

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2599 Bryan et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2646

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2646 Krell By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2682

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2682 Berman et al. By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2691

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2691 Addis et al. By Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2706

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2706 Soria By Caballero

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2768

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2768 Ahrens et al. By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2771

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2771 Berman By Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2775

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2775 Berman By Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2776

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2776 E.S. & T.M. (Connolly) By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2776

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2776 E.S. & T.M. (Connolly) By Blakespear Reconsider

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2790

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2790 C. & C. (Boerner) By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 222

Unfinished Business SB222 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 501

Unfinished Business SB501 Allen Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 503

Unfinished Business SB503 Weber Pierson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 542

Unfinished Business SB542 Limón Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 742

Unfinished Business SB742 Pérez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 904

Unfinished Business SB904 Seyarto et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 948

Unfinished Business SB948 Arreguín et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 950

Unfinished Business SB950 Weber Pierson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 964

Unfinished Business SB964 Smallwood-Cuevas Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 999

Unfinished Business SB999 Weber Pierson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1012

Unfinished Business SB1012 Smallwood-Cuevas Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1023

Unfinished Business SB1023 Laird et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1023

Unfinished Business SB1023 Laird et al. Concurrence Reconsider

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1023

Unfinished Business SB1023 Laird et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1037

Unfinished Business SB1037 Weber Pierson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1117

Unfinished Business SB1117 Cervantes et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1166

Unfinished Business SB1166 Arreguín et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1218

Unfinished Business SB1218 Arreguín et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1220

Unfinished Business SB1220 Hurtado Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1261

Unfinished Business SB1261 Laird et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1267

Unfinished Business SB1267 Allen Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1279

Unfinished Business SB1279 Gonzalez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1283

Unfinished Business SB1283 Ashby Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1288

Unfinished Business SB1288 Laird et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1299

Unfinished Business SB1299 Arreguín Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1412

Unfinished Business SB1412 Rubio Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1417

Unfinished Business SB1417 Pérez et al. Concurrence