Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Tom Umberg

Tom Umberg

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 34

In office
2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 34 · 2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

The record

5,142 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2664

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2664 Bauer-Kahan et al. By Becker Reconsider

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2664

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2664 Bauer-Kahan et al. By Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2689

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2689 Ávila Farías et al. By Caballero

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2713

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2713 Wicks et al. By Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2779

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2779 Irwin By Allen Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2782

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2782 JUD. (Kalra) By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACA 7

Assembly 3rd Reading ACA7 Jackson et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 96

Special Consent SB96 Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 239

Unfinished Business SB239 Arreguín Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 299

Unfinished Business SB299 Cabaldon et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 490

Unfinished Business SB490 Umberg et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 505

Special Consent SB505 Richardson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 549

Unfinished Business SB549 Allen et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 594

Unfinished Business SB594 Padilla et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 667

Unfinished Business SB667 Archuleta Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 700

Unfinished Business SB700 Grayson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 747

Unfinished Business SB747 Wiener et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 758

Unfinished Business SB758 Umberg et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 769

Unfinished Business SB769 Caballero et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 772

Unfinished Business SB772 Cabaldon et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 802

Unfinished Business SB802 Ashby et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 837

Special Consent SB837 Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 845

Special Consent SB845 Pérez et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 849

Unfinished Business SB849 Weber Pierson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 894

Unfinished Business SB894 Allen et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 913

Unfinished Business SB913 Becker et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 916

Special Consent SB916 Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 920

Unfinished Business SB920 Archuleta Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 923

Unfinished Business SB923 Becker Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 936

Special Consent SB936 Blakespear et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 955

Special Consent SB955 Blakespear et al. Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 959

Unfinished Business SB959 Grayson et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 965

Special Consent SB965 Blakespear et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 971

Special Consent SB971 Choi et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 973

Special Consent SB973 Becker et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 974

Special Consent SB974 Seyarto

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 983

Unfinished Business SB983 Weber Pierson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 993

Special Consent SB993 Ochoa Bogh et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 996

Unfinished Business SB996 Padilla et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1000

Unfinished Business SB1000 Becker Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1004

Unfinished Business SB1004 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1017

Special Consent SB1017 Reyes et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1024

Unfinished Business SB1024 Menjivar et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1047

Special Consent SB1047 Niello et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1048

Unfinished Business SB1048 Becker et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1051

Unfinished Business SB1051 Menjivar et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1062

Unfinished Business SB1062 Ochoa Bogh Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1064

Special Consent SB1064 Dahle et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1067

Unfinished Business SB1067 Weber Pierson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1069

Special Consent SB1069 Grayson et al