Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Tom Umberg

Tom Umberg

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 34

In office
2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 34 · 2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

The record

4,506 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2465

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2465 Ortega et al. By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2475

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2475 E.M. (Ransom) By Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2477

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2477 Chen By Valladares

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2480

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2480 Ávila Farías et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2486

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2486 Addis By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2490

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2490 Valencia et al. By Caballero

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2495

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2495 Kalra et al. By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2499

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2499 Gipson By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2502

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2502 Pellerin et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2510

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2510 Arambula By Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2531

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2531 Irwin et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2541

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2541 Mark González et al. By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2571

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2571 Flora By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2589

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2589 Irwin et al. By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2599

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2599 Bryan et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2646

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2646 Krell By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2682

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2682 Berman et al. By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2691

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2691 Addis et al. By Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2706

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2706 Soria By Caballero

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2768

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2768 Ahrens et al. By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2771

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2771 Berman By Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2775

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2775 Berman By Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2776

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2776 E.S. & T.M. (Connolly) By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2776

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2776 E.S. & T.M. (Connolly) By Blakespear Reconsider

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2790

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2790 C. & C. (Boerner) By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 222

Unfinished Business SB222 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 501

Unfinished Business SB501 Allen Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 503

Unfinished Business SB503 Weber Pierson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 542

Unfinished Business SB542 Limón Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 742

Unfinished Business SB742 Pérez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 904

Unfinished Business SB904 Seyarto et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 948

Unfinished Business SB948 Arreguín et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 950

Unfinished Business SB950 Weber Pierson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 964

Unfinished Business SB964 Smallwood-Cuevas Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 999

Unfinished Business SB999 Weber Pierson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1012

Unfinished Business SB1012 Smallwood-Cuevas Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1023

Unfinished Business SB1023 Laird et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1023

Unfinished Business SB1023 Laird et al. Concurrence Reconsider

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1023

Unfinished Business SB1023 Laird et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1037

Unfinished Business SB1037 Weber Pierson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1117

Unfinished Business SB1117 Cervantes et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1166

Unfinished Business SB1166 Arreguín et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1218

Unfinished Business SB1218 Arreguín et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1220

Unfinished Business SB1220 Hurtado Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1261

Unfinished Business SB1261 Laird et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1267

Unfinished Business SB1267 Allen Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1279

Unfinished Business SB1279 Gonzalez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1283

Unfinished Business SB1283 Ashby Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1288

Unfinished Business SB1288 Laird et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1299

Unfinished Business SB1299 Arreguín Concurrence