Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Tom Umberg

Tom Umberg

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 34

In office
2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 34 · 2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

The record

5,142 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1383

Unfinished Business SB1383 Arreguín et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1394

Unfinished Business SB1394 Gonzalez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 635

Assembly 3rd Reading AB635 Ahrens et al. By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 282

Assembly 3rd Reading AB282 Pellerin By Wahab Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 540

Assembly 3rd Reading AB540 Connolly By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 605

Assembly 3rd Reading AB605 Muratsuchi By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 917

Assembly 3rd Reading AB917 Ávila Farías By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1039

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1039 Hart et al. By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1542

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1542 Ward By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1602

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1602 Blanca Rubio By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1715

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1715 Schiavo By Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1815

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1815 Wicks et al. By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1883

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1883 Bryan By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1974

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1974 Stefani By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1983

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1983 Blanca Rubio By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2074

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2074 Haney et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2142

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2142 Garcia By Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2179

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2179 Patel et al. By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2253

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2253 Boerner By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2344

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2344 Haney et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2551

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2551 Elhawary By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2573

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2573 Sharp-Collins By Weber Pierson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2575

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2575 Ortega By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2575

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2575 Ortega By Padilla Reconsider

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2601

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2601 Lee By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2770

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2770 Alvarez et al. By Jones

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 58

Unfinished Business SB58 Padilla et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 327

Unfinished Business SB327 McNerney et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 329

Special Consent SB329 Blakespear et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 331

Unfinished Business SB331 Menjivar et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 354

Unfinished Business SB354 Limón Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 420

Unfinished Business SB420 Padilla et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 526

Unfinished Business SB526 Pérez Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 626

Special Consent SB626 Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 661

Special Consent SB661 Hurtado

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 675

Unfinished Business SB675 Padilla Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 690

Unfinished Business SB690 Caballero et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 750

Unfinished Business SB750 Cortese et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 804

Unfinished Business SB804 Archuleta et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 869

Unfinished Business SB869 Weber Pierson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 873

Unfinished Business SB873 Reyes et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 891

Special Consent SB891 Cervantes et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 938

Unfinished Business SB938 Menjivar et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 944

Special Consent SB944 Wiener et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 954

Unfinished Business SB954 Blakespear et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 969

Unfinished Business SB969 Reyes et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 989

Unfinished Business SB989 Blakespear et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 991

Special Consent SB991 Menjivar et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1046

Special Consent SB1046 Blakespear et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1128

Unfinished Business SB1128 Stern et al. Concurrence