Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Tom Umberg

Tom Umberg

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 34

In office
2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 34 · 2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

The record

4,696 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1294

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1294 Haney et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1338

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1338 Solache By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1381

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1381 Muratsuchi By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1439

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1439 Garcia et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1448

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1448 Hart et al. By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1457

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1457 Bryan By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1547

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1547 Bains By Hurtado Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1577

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1577 Bauer-Kahan By McGuire

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1595

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1595 Schultz By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1599

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1599 Ahrens et al. By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1603

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1603 Schultz By Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1608

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1608 Wilson By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1615

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1615 Nguyen et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1626

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1626 Gabriel et al. By Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1628

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1628 Michelle Rodriguez By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1629

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1629 Haney et al. By Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1641

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1641 Jackson et al. By Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1663

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1663 Wallis et al. By Valladares

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1666

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1666 Rogers By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1679

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1679 Mark González et al. By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1682

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1682 Hart et al. By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1685

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1685 Lackey et al. By Archuleta

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1688

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1688 Carrillo et al. By Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1689

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1689 Quirk-Silva By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1693

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1693 Zbur et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1721

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1721 Muratsuchi By Ochoa Bogh

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1751

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1751 Quirk-Silva et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1753

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1753 Stefani et al. By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1766

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1766 Krell By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1770

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1770 Garcia et al. By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1804

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1804 Hart et al. By Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1811

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1811 Rogers et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1838

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1838 Berman

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1842

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1842 Harabedian et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1856

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1856 Wicks By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1857

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1857 Aguiar-Curry et al. By Richardson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1886

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1886 Elhawary By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1889

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1889 Ramos By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1901

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1901 Berman By McGuire

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1917

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1917 Schultz By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1930

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1930 Zbur et al. By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1931

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1931 Papan By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1946

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1946 Wicks et al. By Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1979

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1979 Bonta By Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2006

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2006 Michelle Rodriguez By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2007

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2007 Bauer-Kahan et al. By Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2030

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2030 Lowenthal et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2038

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2038 Harabedian et al. By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2050

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2050 Caloza et al. By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2078

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2078 Rogers By Laird