Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Tom Umberg

Tom Umberg

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 34

In office
2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 34 · 2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

The record

5,142 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 312

Assembly 3rd Reading AB312 Alanis By Alvarado-Gil

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 350

Assembly 3rd Reading AB350 Bonta et al. By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 353

Assembly 3rd Reading AB353 Boerner By Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 464

Assembly 3rd Reading AB464 Aguiar-Curry et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 540

That the measure be returned to Senate Floor for consideration. Ordered to third reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 611

Assembly 3rd Reading AB611 Lee By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 685

Assembly 3rd Reading AB685 Solache et al. By Hurtado

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 706

Assembly 3rd Reading AB706 Aguiar-Curry et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 864

Assembly 3rd Reading AB864 Ward By Allen

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 883

Assembly 3rd Reading AB883 Lowenthal et al. By Cabaldon

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 929

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 939

Assembly 3rd Reading AB939 Schultz et al. By Caballero

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1049

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1049 Celeste Rodriguez By Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1054

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1054 Gipson et al. By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1128

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1128 Muratsuchi et al. By Allen

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1165

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1165 Gipson et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1184

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1184 Patterson et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1294

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1294 Haney et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1338

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1338 Solache By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1381

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1381 Muratsuchi By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1439

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1439 Garcia et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1448

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1448 Hart et al. By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1457

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1457 Bryan By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1547

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1547 Bains By Hurtado Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1577

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1577 Bauer-Kahan By McGuire

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1595

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1595 Schultz By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1599

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1599 Ahrens et al. By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1603

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1603 Schultz By Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1608

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1608 Wilson By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1615

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1615 Nguyen et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1626

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1626 Gabriel et al. By Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1628

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1628 Michelle Rodriguez By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1629

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1629 Haney et al. By Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1641

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1641 Jackson et al. By Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1663

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1663 Wallis et al. By Valladares

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1666

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1666 Rogers By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1679

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1679 Mark González et al. By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1682

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1682 Hart et al. By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1685

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1685 Lackey et al. By Archuleta

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1688

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1688 Carrillo et al. By Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1689

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1689 Quirk-Silva By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1693

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1693 Zbur et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1721

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1721 Muratsuchi By Ochoa Bogh

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1751

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1751 Quirk-Silva et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1753

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1753 Stefani et al. By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1766

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1766 Krell By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1770

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1770 Garcia et al. By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1804

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1804 Hart et al. By Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1811

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1811 Rogers et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1838

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1838 Berman