Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Tim Grayson

Tim Grayson

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 9

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Concord is the clearest local marker in Tim Grayson’s public career. Before seeking state office, he worked as a construction contractor and served on the Concord City Council. In November 2016, he ran for the California State Assembly, beginning a legislative tenure that continued through 2024. He represented two Assembly districts during those years, then contested Senate District 9 in November 2024. His move into the Assembly also involved a party change: once a Republican, he switched parties to make that run.

BEFORE PUBLIC OFFICE

Grayson was born on September 17, 1967. The available account of his working life before politics is brief but concrete: he was a construction contractor. It does not identify his business, projects or years in the trade.

His first identified public office was on the Concord City Council. That put municipal office before his eight years in the Assembly, although no council dates, votes or policy initiatives are specified. The sequence is the important part of the record: construction work, the Concord council and then a campaign for state office.

That path also kept Concord in the foreground. Grayson’s later offices carried district numbers and broader constituencies, but the local government post identified with him was the council in Concord.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

Grayson ran for the Assembly in November 2016. He had once been a Republican and switched parties to run for the Assembly. No further account of that change, including his reasons for it, is given.

He served in the California State Assembly from 2016 to 2024. From 2016 through 2022, he represented the 14th Assembly District. From 2022 through 2024, he represented the 15th Assembly District. The district designation changed; his Assembly service continued.

In November 2024, Grayson ran for the California State Senate, contesting the 9th District seat. That campaign followed his council service and two successive Assembly district assignments. The documented career is thus an institutional progression: Concord city government, the Assembly and a Senate race.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Grayson’s offices and campaigns are clear. A distinct policy signature is not. No particular legislation, budget decision, committee assignment, appointment, vote or organized cause is identified in the account of his career. Nor does it name a specific constituency or interest whose policy priorities he repeatedly advanced.

It would therefore go beyond the documented facts to label him primarily as a policymaker on housing, labor, public safety, transportation, construction or any other issue. His work as a construction contractor cannot by itself be turned into a legislative agenda, and his party change cannot be assigned a policy meaning without further detail.

What can be said is narrower. Grayson brought experience in construction and Concord municipal office into an Assembly career lasting from 2016 to 2024. He represented the 14th and then the 15th Assembly districts before contesting Senate District 9. For voters looking for the interests he has been most committed to serving through policy, the offices establish the reach of his career; the policy record provided here does not establish the answer.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 14 · former
  • State Senate · Senate District 9 · 2024–present
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 15 · 2022–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Concord is the clearest local marker in Tim Grayson’s public career. Before seeking state office, he worked as a construction contractor and served on the Concord City Council. In November 2016, he ran for the California State Assembly, beginning a legislative tenure that continued through 2024. He represented two Assembly districts during those years, then contested Senate District 9 in November 2024. His move into the Assembly also involved a party change: once a Republican, he switched parties to make that run.

BEFORE PUBLIC OFFICE

Grayson was born on September 17, 1967. The available account of his working life before politics is brief but concrete: he was a construction contractor. It does not identify his business, projects or years in the trade.

His first identified public office was on the Concord City Council. That put municipal office before his eight years in the Assembly, although no council dates, votes or policy initiatives are specified. The sequence is the important part of the record: construction work, the Concord council and then a campaign for state office.

That path also kept Concord in the foreground. Grayson’s later offices carried district numbers and broader constituencies, but the local government post identified with him was the council in Concord.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

Grayson ran for the Assembly in November 2016. He had once been a Republican and switched parties to run for the Assembly. No further account of that change, including his reasons for it, is given.

He served in the California State Assembly from 2016 to 2024. From 2016 through 2022, he represented the 14th Assembly District. From 2022 through 2024, he represented the 15th Assembly District. The district designation changed; his Assembly service continued.

In November 2024, Grayson ran for the California State Senate, contesting the 9th District seat. That campaign followed his council service and two successive Assembly district assignments. The documented career is thus an institutional progression: Concord city government, the Assembly and a Senate race.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Grayson’s offices and campaigns are clear. A distinct policy signature is not. No particular legislation, budget decision, committee assignment, appointment, vote or organized cause is identified in the account of his career. Nor does it name a specific constituency or interest whose policy priorities he repeatedly advanced.

It would therefore go beyond the documented facts to label him primarily as a policymaker on housing, labor, public safety, transportation, construction or any other issue. His work as a construction contractor cannot by itself be turned into a legislative agenda, and his party change cannot be assigned a policy meaning without further detail.

What can be said is narrower. Grayson brought experience in construction and Concord municipal office into an Assembly career lasting from 2016 to 2024. He represented the 14th and then the 15th Assembly districts before contesting Senate District 9. For voters looking for the interests he has been most committed to serving through policy, the offices establish the reach of his career; the policy record provided here does not establish the answer.

The record

7,786 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 244

Do pass as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 243

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 238

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 236

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 234

Do pass as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 228

Do pass as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 224

Do pass as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 221

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 226

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 98

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 88

Do pass as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 87

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 86

Do pass as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 84

Do pass as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 82

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 81

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 80

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 79

Do pass as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 78

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 76

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 75

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 74

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 72

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 71

Do pass as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 70

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 69

Do pass as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 68

Do pass as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 63

Do pass as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 62

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 57

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 56

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 55

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 54

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 53

Do pass as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 48

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 50

Do pass as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 42

Do pass as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 41

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 67

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 40

Do pass as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 37

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 36

Do pass as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 35

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 59

Do pass as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 32

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 34

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 31

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 31

[05-23-2025] set for [First] hearing: Reconsideration of favorable vote granted

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 31

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 29

Do pass as amended