Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Maggy Krell

Maggy Krell

Democratic

State Assembly · Assembly District 6

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

In 2024, Maggy Krell bused dozens of volunteers from Sacramento to Reno to campaign for a Nevada ballot measure establishing abortion access as a right in the state constitution. The initiative passed, and Krell won 66% of the vote in her own election to the California State Assembly. She now represents Assembly District 6 after a career spent prosecuting criminal cases, leading California’s Special Prosecution Unit and handling reproductive-health litigation for Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California. Her campaign also promised work on public safety, high prices, homelessness and programs for vulnerable youth. Upon taking office, she introduced legislation protecting Californians’ access to medication abortion.

THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB

Krell received her law degree from the University of California, Davis School of Law in 2003 and began as a deputy district attorney for San Joaquin County in Stockton. She later moved to the California Department of Justice, where her cases included cold-case murders, white-collar crime and matters crossing multiple jurisdictions. She rose to supervising deputy attorney general and led California’s Special Prosecution Unit.

Human trafficking became a substantial part of that record. Krell led the successful prosecution of executives of Backpage.com, which was shut down in 2018. The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children gave her a career achievement award for her work on the case. She recounted it in her 2022 book, *Taking Down Backpage: Fighting the World’s Largest Sex Trafficker: A Prosecutor’s Story*.

Her work was not limited to prosecuting traffickers. Krell helped secure the early release of a sex-trafficking survivor who had been imprisoned as a teenager, and she has argued publicly that the criminal justice system must treat victims better.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

Krell first sought elected office in 2014, when she ran for Sacramento County district attorney and lost to Anne Marie Schubert. Four years later, she joined Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California as chief legal counsel, working against Trump administration efforts to cut funding and restrict access to low-cost reproductive health care.

That work proceeded through the courts. Krell filed an amicus brief defending a California law concerning misinformation about reproductive health care. She also sought an injunction under the federal government’s Title X rule to defend access to federal family-planning funds. After the Trump administration began separating families arrested at the U.S.-Mexico border, she volunteered as a lawyer helping to reunite parents and children.

Krell returned to electoral politics in 2024. She won the Assembly primary by more than 10 points in a field that included six other Democrats. Her general-election campaign included the Sacramento-to-Reno volunteer effort for Nevada’s constitutional abortion measure, while her district platform joined reproductive access with public safety, affordability, homelessness and vulnerable-youth programs.

THE THROUGH LINE

Krell’s clearest policy signature is reproductive health care, first as a lawyer and now as a legislator. At Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, she used an amicus brief and an injunction request to defend state law, federal family-planning money and access to low-cost care. During her Assembly campaign, she bused dozens of volunteers from Sacramento to Reno to campaign for the Nevada constitutional initiative. Once in office, she moved to protect access to medication abortion through legislation.

The rest of the record identifies the interests she has repeatedly put before institutions: trafficking survivors, crime victims, separated parents and children, people seeking reproductive care and vulnerable young people. Public safety is also part of that record, not only as a campaign promise but through murder, white-collar and multi-jurisdictional prosecutions and the Backpage case.

The mechanism has changed with the office. As a prosecutor, Krell brought cases and led a state unit. As counsel, she pursued litigation. As a candidate, she organized volunteers and won votes. In the Assembly, the instrument is legislation; her documented emphasis there continues the reproductive-access work she pursued at Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 6 · 2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

In 2024, Maggy Krell bused dozens of volunteers from Sacramento to Reno to campaign for a Nevada ballot measure establishing abortion access as a right in the state constitution. The initiative passed, and Krell won 66% of the vote in her own election to the California State Assembly. She now represents Assembly District 6 after a career spent prosecuting criminal cases, leading California’s Special Prosecution Unit and handling reproductive-health litigation for Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California. Her campaign also promised work on public safety, high prices, homelessness and programs for vulnerable youth. Upon taking office, she introduced legislation protecting Californians’ access to medication abortion.

THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB

Krell received her law degree from the University of California, Davis School of Law in 2003 and began as a deputy district attorney for San Joaquin County in Stockton. She later moved to the California Department of Justice, where her cases included cold-case murders, white-collar crime and matters crossing multiple jurisdictions. She rose to supervising deputy attorney general and led California’s Special Prosecution Unit.

Human trafficking became a substantial part of that record. Krell led the successful prosecution of executives of Backpage.com, which was shut down in 2018. The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children gave her a career achievement award for her work on the case. She recounted it in her 2022 book, *Taking Down Backpage: Fighting the World’s Largest Sex Trafficker: A Prosecutor’s Story*.

Her work was not limited to prosecuting traffickers. Krell helped secure the early release of a sex-trafficking survivor who had been imprisoned as a teenager, and she has argued publicly that the criminal justice system must treat victims better.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

Krell first sought elected office in 2014, when she ran for Sacramento County district attorney and lost to Anne Marie Schubert. Four years later, she joined Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California as chief legal counsel, working against Trump administration efforts to cut funding and restrict access to low-cost reproductive health care.

That work proceeded through the courts. Krell filed an amicus brief defending a California law concerning misinformation about reproductive health care. She also sought an injunction under the federal government’s Title X rule to defend access to federal family-planning funds. After the Trump administration began separating families arrested at the U.S.-Mexico border, she volunteered as a lawyer helping to reunite parents and children.

Krell returned to electoral politics in 2024. She won the Assembly primary by more than 10 points in a field that included six other Democrats. Her general-election campaign included the Sacramento-to-Reno volunteer effort for Nevada’s constitutional abortion measure, while her district platform joined reproductive access with public safety, affordability, homelessness and vulnerable-youth programs.

THE THROUGH LINE

Krell’s clearest policy signature is reproductive health care, first as a lawyer and now as a legislator. At Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, she used an amicus brief and an injunction request to defend state law, federal family-planning money and access to low-cost care. During her Assembly campaign, she bused dozens of volunteers from Sacramento to Reno to campaign for the Nevada constitutional initiative. Once in office, she moved to protect access to medication abortion through legislation.

The rest of the record identifies the interests she has repeatedly put before institutions: trafficking survivors, crime victims, separated parents and children, people seeking reproductive care and vulnerable young people. Public safety is also part of that record, not only as a campaign promise but through murder, white-collar and multi-jurisdictional prosecutions and the Backpage case.

The mechanism has changed with the office. As a prosecutor, Krell brought cases and led a state unit. As counsel, she pursued litigation. As a candidate, she organized volunteers and won votes. In the Assembly, the instrument is legislation; her documented emphasis there continues the reproductive-access work she pursued at Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California.

The record

6,071 events, each with its source
VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1627

AB 1627 Ávila Farías Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1687

AB 1687 Lackey Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1699

AB 1699 Rogers Concurrence - Urgency Added

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1715

AB 1715 Schiavo Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1776

AB 1776 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1811

AB 1811 Rogers Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1815

AB 1815 Wicks Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1843

AB 1843 Elhawary Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1853

AB 1853 Pellerin Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1881

AB 1881 Ramos Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1883

AB 1883 Bryan Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1887

AB 1887 Zbur Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1902

AB 1902 Pellerin Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1934

AB 1934 Bennett Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1960

AB 1960 Bennett Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1974

AB 1974 Stefani Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2009

AB 2009 Chen Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2017

AB 2017 Haney Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2028

AB 2028 Chen Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2032

AB 2032 Ransom Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2074

AB 2074 Haney Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2121

AB 2121 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2152

AB 2152 Mark González Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2179

AB 2179 Patel Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2207

AB 2207 Hadwick Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2221

AB 2221 Irwin Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2246

AB 2246 Wicks Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2253

AB 2253 Boerner Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2261

AB 2261 Dixon Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2266

AB 2266 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2281

AB 2281 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2319

AB 2319 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2329

AB 2329 Fong Concurrence - Urgency Added

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2337

AB 2337 Lackey Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2417

AB 2417 Zbur Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2433

AB 2433 Alvarez Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2434

AB 2434 Bonta Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2467

AB 2467 ED. Concurrence in Senate Amendments By PATEL

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2518

AB 2518 Sharp-Collins Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2540

AB 2540 Stefani Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2563

AB 2563 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2573

AB 2573 Sharp-Collins Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2592

AB 2592 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2598

AB 2598 Krell Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2601

AB 2601 Lee Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2604

AB 2604 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2631

AB 2631 Bauer-Kahan Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2633

AB 2633 Gipson Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2664

AB 2664 Bauer-Kahan Concurrence in Senate Amendments

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2667

AB 2667 Hadwick Concurrence in Senate Amendments