Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Angelique Ashby

Angelique Ashby

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 8

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Angelique Ashby’s route through Sacramento runs from Sacramento High School to the City Council and now the State Senate. Her family moved to the region while she was in elementary school, settling first in Roseville and later in the City of Sacramento. She spent 12 years on the Sacramento City Council, representing the first district and serving seven times as vice mayor or mayor pro tem. In 2022, District 8 voters chose her after a costly contest between two Democrats. Her record includes work on homelessness, school funding, literacy, economic development, infrastructure and climate change, alongside a personal history of using social services and consulting programs for parolees, foster children and incarcerated women.

ROOTS

Ashby was born in Ashland, Oregon, on March 20, 1975. After her family moved to the Greater Sacramento region, she attended Sierra Gardens Elementary School and Warren T. Eich Junior High in Roseville. The family later moved into Sacramento, where she graduated from Sacramento High School.

She became a single mother at 20. She lived in low-income housing and used subsidized childcare, food assistance and other social service programs. She later earned a bachelor’s degree from the University of California, Davis, and a law degree from the University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law.

Her father had headed California’s state foster care system. Ashby and her late father founded a consulting firm that created programs to assist parolees, foster children and incarcerated women.

CITY HALL TO THE SENATE

Ashby was elected to the Sacramento City Council in 2010. During her 12 years there, her work included homelessness, school funding, literacy, economic development, infrastructure and climate change. She was the council’s only female member for more than six years and the first female councilmember to give birth while holding office.

Her 2022 campaign for Senate District 8 became one of the most expensive state races on record, with $14.5 million spent, according to Cal Matters. Ashby and former Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones both ran as Democrats. Her endorsements included former state senator Richard Pan, Gov. Gavin Newsom, former governor Jerry Brown and EMILY’s List.

The campaign also produced a fight over how Ashby could describe herself to voters. Jones sued the California secretary of state to remove her ballot designation as a “women’s advocate,” arguing that it was not a profession. Ashby changed the designation to “Sacramento City Councilwoman.”

She finished second to Jones in the June 7 primary, then won the Nov. 8 general election. Jones conceded on Nov. 29 after Ashby’s election-night lead grew with each ballot-count update. The result made Ashby the first woman in more than 20 years elected to the State Senate representing the majority of Sacramento County, and only the second woman ever to do so.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Ashby’s documented record includes her personal use of low-income housing and social service programs; consulting programs for parolees, foster children and incarcerated women; and City Council work focused on homelessness, school funding, literacy, economic development, infrastructure and climate change.

She was the lone woman on the City Council for more than six years and the first female councilmember to give birth while in office. Her Senate campaign received support from EMILY’s List, Richard Pan, Gavin Newsom and Jerry Brown.

The 2022 campaign also included the dispute over her proposed “women’s advocate” ballot designation, the lawsuit filed by Jones and her revised designation as “Sacramento City Councilwoman.” After winning the general election, she became a member of the California State Senate representing District 8 in December 2022.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 8 · 2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Angelique Ashby’s route through Sacramento runs from Sacramento High School to the City Council and now the State Senate. Her family moved to the region while she was in elementary school, settling first in Roseville and later in the City of Sacramento. She spent 12 years on the Sacramento City Council, representing the first district and serving seven times as vice mayor or mayor pro tem. In 2022, District 8 voters chose her after a costly contest between two Democrats. Her record includes work on homelessness, school funding, literacy, economic development, infrastructure and climate change, alongside a personal history of using social services and consulting programs for parolees, foster children and incarcerated women.

ROOTS

Ashby was born in Ashland, Oregon, on March 20, 1975. After her family moved to the Greater Sacramento region, she attended Sierra Gardens Elementary School and Warren T. Eich Junior High in Roseville. The family later moved into Sacramento, where she graduated from Sacramento High School.

She became a single mother at 20. She lived in low-income housing and used subsidized childcare, food assistance and other social service programs. She later earned a bachelor’s degree from the University of California, Davis, and a law degree from the University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law.

Her father had headed California’s state foster care system. Ashby and her late father founded a consulting firm that created programs to assist parolees, foster children and incarcerated women.

CITY HALL TO THE SENATE

Ashby was elected to the Sacramento City Council in 2010. During her 12 years there, her work included homelessness, school funding, literacy, economic development, infrastructure and climate change. She was the council’s only female member for more than six years and the first female councilmember to give birth while holding office.

Her 2022 campaign for Senate District 8 became one of the most expensive state races on record, with $14.5 million spent, according to Cal Matters. Ashby and former Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones both ran as Democrats. Her endorsements included former state senator Richard Pan, Gov. Gavin Newsom, former governor Jerry Brown and EMILY’s List.

The campaign also produced a fight over how Ashby could describe herself to voters. Jones sued the California secretary of state to remove her ballot designation as a “women’s advocate,” arguing that it was not a profession. Ashby changed the designation to “Sacramento City Councilwoman.”

She finished second to Jones in the June 7 primary, then won the Nov. 8 general election. Jones conceded on Nov. 29 after Ashby’s election-night lead grew with each ballot-count update. The result made Ashby the first woman in more than 20 years elected to the State Senate representing the majority of Sacramento County, and only the second woman ever to do so.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Ashby’s documented record includes her personal use of low-income housing and social service programs; consulting programs for parolees, foster children and incarcerated women; and City Council work focused on homelessness, school funding, literacy, economic development, infrastructure and climate change.

She was the lone woman on the City Council for more than six years and the first female councilmember to give birth while in office. Her Senate campaign received support from EMILY’s List, Richard Pan, Gavin Newsom and Jerry Brown.

The 2022 campaign also included the dispute over her proposed “women’s advocate” ballot designation, the lawsuit filed by Jones and her revised designation as “Sacramento City Councilwoman.” After winning the general election, she became a member of the California State Senate representing District 8 in December 2022.

The record

4,947 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 82

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 84

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 833

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 825

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 95

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 362

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 822

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 809

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 860

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 779

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 768

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 859

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 384

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 728

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 707

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 706

[First] hearing set for [04-22-2025]: Failed passage in Committee. Reconsideration granted

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 706

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Banking and Financial Institutions]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 702

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 697

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 678

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 676

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 673

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 659

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 658

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Local Government]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 656

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Business, Professions and Economic Development]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 648

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 629

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Local Government]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 616

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 614

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Environmental Quality]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 52

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 597

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 580

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Local Government]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 352

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 577

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 561

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 518

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 504

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 501

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 32

Be adopted as amended

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 418

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 477

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 320

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 310

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 517

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 679

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Judiciary]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 541

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 540

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 351

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 787

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 667

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Transportation]